Teaching and Translation

Abstract

FALSE CHOICES ABOUT TEACHING If you are looking for a cutting edge diagnosis of contemporary debates over teaching, we recommend John Dewey’s Child and Curriculum (written in 1902!). Talk of teaching today reveals a pronounced case of the dichotomous thinking that troubled Dewey: on the one side, there is the principled refusal to teach in the name of the creativity and initiative of students; on the other side, there is the teacher who is monologically trying to impose a body of knowledge on passive students. We see this sort of argument in one way, in Paulo Freire; in another way, in Jacques Ranciere. Like Dewey, we argue that there is a third way that avoids the false choice between imposing a teacher’s point of view or granting privilege to the student’s point of view. It is not the third way of dialogue, or at least not dialogue the way it is sometimes presented: each learning from the other, or a Socratic leading of the student to the teacher’s intended conclusions. Rather, we find the ideas of translation and third space to be potentially productive here.