Abstract
DePauw University, Greencastle, Indiana. 1. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) (2006). 2. See, e.g., Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 23 (1993). 3. Id. at 21 (quoting Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 65, 67 (1986)). 4. See Lori A. Tetreault, Annotation, Liability of Employer, Under Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e et seq.) for Sexual Harassment of Employee by Customer, Client, or Patron, 163 A.L.R. FED. 445 (2000). 5. See id.; see also EEOC Guidelines, 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(e) (2008) (“An employer may also be responsible for the acts of non-employees . . . where the employer . . . knows or should have known of the conduct and fails to take immediate and appropriate corrective action.”). 6. 491 F. Supp. 2d 467 (D. Del. 2007). 7. Id. at 476-78. 8. Id. at 471-73. 9. Id. at 471-72. TEACHERS’ SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIMS BASED ON STUDENT CONDUCT: DO SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS WAIVE THEIR RIGHT TO A HARASSMENT-FREE WORKPLACE?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.