Abstract
Academic vocabulary knowledge is central to reading and academic achievement. Largely based in the lexicons of Latin and Greek, academic vocabulary comprises morphemic structures. Many teachers devote little time to focused instruction in this area because they may lack pertinent morphological and pedagogical knowledge. This article reports findings from a broader three-year longitudinal qualitative case study that explored the experiences of three elementary teachers who engaged in professional development that included study of the morphemic features of academic vocabulary and instructional techniques. This article describes changes teachers made to practice because of their deeper understanding of Latin and Greek morphology and how to teach it. Data sources included in-depth and semistructured interviews, direct observations of classroom practice, and analysis of instructional artifacts. Data analysis revealed that all three participants moved from teacher-centered, definitional approaches towards instruction that was student-centered and focused on developing metalinguistic awareness. Instructional shifts reflected participants’ new understandings about metalinguistic awareness, student-directed problem-solving, and collaborative talk in vocabulary learning. Instructional shifts address metalinguistic awareness, morphology, word consciousness, and Spanish–English cognate instruction—areas that may be overlooked in many classrooms.
Highlights
Scholars agree that the ability to understand academic vocabulary is central to reading comprehension and academic achievement for all students [1,2,3,4]
Based in the lexicons of Latin and Greek, academic vocabulary comprises complex morphemic structures that generate conceptually important terminology not always heard outside the context of school [5,6]
Teachers need opportunities to engage in extended, focused study of the linguistic and morphemic structures of academic vocabulary so that they can develop their knowledge of this instructional domain
Summary
Scholars agree that the ability to understand academic vocabulary is central to reading comprehension and academic achievement for all students [1,2,3,4]. To teach academic vocabulary effectively and develop students’ metalinguistic awareness, teachers themselves must first understand the intricate linguistic features and morphological structures that comprise the academic register. To achieve these ends, teachers need opportunities to engage in extended, focused study of the linguistic and morphemic structures of academic vocabulary so that they can develop their knowledge of this instructional domain. Teachers need opportunities to engage in extended, focused study of the linguistic and morphemic structures of academic vocabulary so that they can develop their knowledge of this instructional domain This should be paired with opportunities to learn effective and research-based instructional techniques and consistently implement those strategies in their classrooms. This article describes specific changes the teachers made to their vocabulary instruction over three years as a result of their deeper understanding of Latin and Greek morphology and how to teach it
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.