Abstract

ABSTRACTQuebec’s mandatory Ethics and Religious Culture Program in 2008 came with challenges. This article discusses the recent ruling of Loyola High School v. Quebec and the implications for teachers. The author argues that given the unrealistic demands of neutrality for teachers of religious education, the Canadian Supreme Court grants Loyola High School a “hybrid” approach. The article suggests that given the complexities of neutrality, teachers exist in a “third space” and that this space becomes all the more important for Loyola teachers given their instructions to teach from both a neutral and confessional standpoint.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.