Abstract

As Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) has matured, the issue of picking the correct benchmark to measure trading performance has been raised by many Head Traders. A desire to simplify the process by determining a single benchmark has been expressed. While appealing, the cost of simplicity of TCA analysis using a single benchmark is that not all of the details of the trading performance may be captured. While it may be possible to define a single benchmark based on a specific implementation strategy, there are many different types of trading strategies and so a benchmark that may be suitable for measuring the performance of one trading strategy may not be suitable for a different trading strategy that has different objectives. The author suggests that the optimal TCA benchmark should be tied to the implementation instructions and any order constraints, and further that for a given trading strategy, the use of multiple benchmarks may provide for a richer analysis of trading performance. There is a trade-off between the simplicity of using a single TCA benchmark and the richness of the TCA analysis that comes from using multiple TCA benchmarks. <b>TOPICS:</b>Performance measurement, quantitative methods, statistical methods

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call