Abstract

While various peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization strategies have been employed, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without plerixafor is widely utilized for its efficacy, safety and cost. To date, the recombinant G-CSF known as tbo-filgrastim has not been compared to traditionally used filgrastim for mobilization of PBSC or for engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Therefore, we sought to compare the efficacy and cost of tbo-filgrastim to filgrastim during mobilization and engraftment. Patients with lymphoma or plasma cell disorders undergoing G-CSF mobilization, with or without plerixafor, were included in this retrospective chart review. Patients receiving a second autologous transplant or mobilized with chemotherapy were excluded. Tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim were given at a dose of 10 mcg/kg daily for four days prior to PBSC collection on day 5. The adjunct use of plerixafor was determined by circulating CD34+ cells/μL on day 4 of mobilization. Post-transplant, each agent was given at a dose of 5 mcg/kg daily on day +7 and continued until neutrophil engraftment. The primary outcome was total collected CD34+ cells/kg. Secondary outcomes included total collection days, peripheral CD34+ cells/μL on day 4 of mobilization, and the adjunctive use of plerixafor. Post-transplant outcomes included time to neutrophil engraftment, the number of blood product transfusions required prior to engraftment, and events of febrile neutropenia. Cost minimization analysis was also conducted to determine direct cost-savings between the two G-CSF products. A total of 148 patients were included in the final analysis. Median patient age was 60 years, 81 (55%) were male and 86 (58%) received filgrastim. Patients in the filgrastim group had a higher median age compared to those receiving tbo-filgrastim (61.5 vs 56 years, p=0.01). There were no other statistically significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups. Patients receiving filgrastim collected a median of 5.565 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg compared to a median of 5.9 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg for the tbo-filgrastim group (p=0.47). There were no statistically significant differences in all secondary endpoints except a mean fewer days of collection in patients receiving tbo-filgrastim (1.4 vs 1.6 days, p=0.01). Patients receiving tbo-filgrastim had a mean cost savings of $761.46 per patient during mobilization and $353.46 per patient during engraftment. Tbo-filgrastim demonstrated similar CD34+ yield as compared to filgrastim in the setting of PBSC collection with no difference in secondary efficacy and safety outcomes. Furthermore, tbo-filgrastim utilization was associated with cost savings of approximately $1,115 per patient.Table 1Patient demongraphics and outcomes*, n = 148Tbo-filgrastimFilgrastimP valueDemographics Age (years)56.0 (29.0-72.0)61.5 (21.0-82.0)0.016 Gender, male33 (53.2%)48 (55.8%)0.867 Diagnosis0.472Plasma cell disorders∗41 (66.1%)62 (72.1%)Lymphoma Mobilization21 (33.9%)24 (27.9%)Mobilization G-CSF(n)6286 CD34 Day 4 (cells/μL)10.5 (0.0-88.0)12.5 (1.0-65.0)0.534 Plerxiafor use45 (72.6%)60 (69.8%)0.854 CD34 Day 5 (cells/μL)5.00 (1.0-292.0)43 (4.0-174.0)0.087 CD34 collected days* (x 106 cells/kg)4.61 (0.12-19.83)3.78 (0.68-16.34)0.150 Total collection days (x 106 cells/kg)1.41.60.010 CD34 infused (x 106 cells/kg)5.90 (0.12-19.83)5.56 (1.69-16.34)0.470Engraftment G-CSF (n)7078 CD34* infused (x 106 cell/kg)3.62 (2.24-10.84)361 (1.70-9.78)0.447 Transfusion*Packed red blood cells1.71.70.866Plalelets1.71.40.113 Ferbrile neutropenia48 (68.6%)53 (67.9%)0.935 Days to WBC engraftment‡11.511.70.251 Days to platelet engraftment‡17.718.50.244Note: G-CSF - granulocyte colony stimulating factor; WBC - white blood cells*All values are median unless otherwise specified.‡Plasma cell disorder includes multiple myeloma; Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia; and amyloidosis.‡Value reported as mean. Open table in a new tab

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.