Abstract

AbstractWe report the development of an accurate computational procedure for the calculation of the n → π* (λmax−1) and π → π* (λmax−2) transitions of a set of thiocarbonyl derivatives. To ensure converged results, all calculations are carried out using the 6‐311+G(2df,p) basis set for time‐dependent calculations, and the 6‐311G(2df,p) for the ground‐state geometrical optimization. Starting with two hybrids, PBE0 and B3LYP, the Hartree–Fock exchange percentage (α) used is optimized in order to reach excitation energies that fit experimental data. It turns out that BLYP(α) is the more adequate functional for calibration. For the n → π* excitation, the optimal α value lies in the 0.10–0.20 interval, whereas for the π → π* process setting α equal to 0.10 provides the most accurate results. The corresponding mean absolute errors (MAE) are limited to 17 nm for λmax−1, and to 10 nm for λmax−2, allowing a consistent and accurate prediction of both transitions. We also assess the merits of the ZINDO//AM1 scheme and it turns out that the semi‐empirical method only provides a poor prediction of the λmax of thiocarbonyl derivatives, especially for the n → π* transition. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2008

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.