Abstract
Creativity is highly valued in all areas of life, and it must be supported in the academic environment for the future prosperity of all organizations. This is the primary source of creativity for practice. The research presented is based on answering the following questions: Are an organization’s members willing to increase their motivation if the organization’s motivational efforts improve? What elements in decision-making are used to support the creativity and motivation of the organization’s members? The paper proposes a novel taxonomy of decision-making factors influencing organizations’ sustainable creativity based on linking the findings from the authors’ surveys. Its application will lead to an improvement in the organizations’ processes, especially in the process of education and knowledge generation. The sociological inquiry was used as the main data collection method. Other methods applied included content analysis, practical cases analysis, and comparison. Methods of mathematical-statistical analysis and deductive-inductive approach were used in the evaluation. This resulted in the confirmation of the impact of creative decision-making approaches by employees and managers on sustainable motivation and creativity in the organization. The taxonomy of decision-making factors for the support of sustainable creativity reflects the results of this original research combined with the findings summarized in the discussion.
Highlights
It is higher education that plays a key role in the overall process of striving for quality and sustainable development
The aspect of sustainable motivation was examined in the branch of the current level of the respondents’ average motivation, as well as efforts to improve oneself in the future
The results revealed that respondents who perceived this factor as effective had a high level of current average motivation (91%) as well as the willingness to increase their efforts in the future (93%)
Summary
It is higher education that plays a key role in the overall process of striving for quality and sustainable development. This paper approaches the quality of working and studying conditions (Ibragimova and Bagaeva 2018) by examining three processes that take place continuously in the academic environment. These include motivation, creativity, and decision-making aimed at supporting them. These processes are partially researched (e.g., Marques 2016; Ryan and Deci 2017; Averill and Major 2020; Kleebbua and Lindratanasirikul 2021), the examination of their overlaps, in higher education, is still absent in the literature. The paper will identify the interconnections between all three processes while accepting their unique features
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.