Abstract

One of the fundamental issues in American forest policy has been the small forest ownership problem. Early in the twentieth century, it was called the farm forestry problem, later, the nonindustrial private forest problem, and today, the family forest problem. Family forest owners are thought to manage their lands in a suboptimal manner resulting in low forest productivity relative to other ownership groups. This can lead to future timber supply problems. The exact nature of the problem, especially its social and economic basis, was a common subject of early forestry research studies. This article includes many of the major nonindustrial private forest or family forest studies, from early to current, and classifies them both by themes used by other authors and categories that relate to major research areas in the current literature. A major focus of this literature deals with promoting management on family forest holdings and possible land management incentives and disincentives. Natural trends in family forest ownership, like parcelization, also impact upon forest management opportunities. By developing a taxonomy that classifies these studies by research objective, methodology, owner motivation, and problem definition, this article serves to organize the family forest literature in a manner that provides a temporal framework for better understanding the historical motivation for and development of family forest research in the United States.

Highlights

  • One of the fundamental and perennial issues in American forest policy has been the small forest ownership problem [1,2,3,4,5]. It surfaced early in the twentieth century when nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) or family forest owners were seen to manage their lands in a suboptimal manner resulting in low forest productivity relative to other ownership groups

  • These same studies explored the characteristics of NIPF owners, such as owner occupation, education, gender, financial position, tenure of ownership, management objectives, tract distance from residence, and size of forest holding

  • In developing NIPF landowner study methodology, what were the measures of performance used and which independent and dependent variables were used in the studies? Early methodology centered on data availability, relevant owner characteristics, subjective measures of management intensity, and obtaining owner management objectives [14,160,161]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the fundamental and perennial issues in American forest policy has been the small forest ownership problem [1,2,3,4,5]. It surfaced early in the twentieth century when nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) or family forest owners were seen to manage their lands in a suboptimal manner resulting in low forest productivity relative to other ownership groups. Forest management on small private ownerships, later called NIPFs, and today family forests, is a fundamental problem in American forestry [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. At around the same time, the first research literature on the NIPF problem was being published

Classical NIPF Literature by Major Contribution to Knowledge
Classical NIPF Ownership Studies
Methodology of Conducting Ownership Studies
General Problems of Promoting Management on NIPF Holdings
Early Forestry Assistance for the NIPF
Integrated Federal Natural Resource Cost-Sharing Programs
Current Status of NIPF Research on Financial Incentives
Marketing Products from NIPF holdings
A Current Motivation-Based Approach to NIPF Landowner Research Studies
Objective classification
Ownership
Ownership Reasons and Objectives
Private Forest Management Planning and Practices
Land Management Incentives and Disincentives
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.