Abstract

Health financing is a complex health system function, which cannot be analysed accurately without tracking each step of the flow of funds separately. We analysed the revenue mix of the Hungarian health insurance fund from 1994 to 2015 and discuss the policy implications of our findings. We used the System of Health Accounts published in 2000 and the revised version of 2011, which introduced separate classifications for the sources of health expenditure. Based on the 2000 version, health insurance contributions were the main source of public funding in Hungary. According to the 2011 version, nearly 70% of health insurance fund revenues came from government tax transfers in 2015, illustrating the striking difference in how revenues and expenditures are reported using this version. Use of the 2011 version will better inform national policy-making and international comparisons and facilitate documentation and analysis of how countries have adapted their revenue mix to changing macroeconomic circumstances. The finding that Hungary has a predominantly tax-funded social health insurance system suggests that traditional understanding and description of health-financing models are no longer adequate and may limit consideration of potential resource-generation options. Hungary is also a good example of how separating revenue generation and pooling broadens policy options to tackle gaps in social health insurance coverage, although the government did not act on these due to the lack of a consistent health-financing strategy. The findings may be particularly relevant for low- and middle-income countries that are trying to expand social health insurance coverage despite limited formal employment.

Highlights

  • Health financing is a key health system function

  • The finding that Hungary has a hybrid tax-funded social health insurance system suggests that the traditional models to describe health-financing systems, such as the tax-based Beveridge-type national health system or the contribution-based Bismarck-type social health insurance system, are not adequate for exploring policy options to improve performance

  • It was the growing recognition that mixed models are common, with evidence of countries channelling general budget revenues to a purchasing agency rather than directly to the supply side,[32] that led to the separate classification of revenue sources and financing schemes in the 2011 version of the System of Health Accounts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Health financing is a key health system function. Such financing can be divided into several subfunctions according to the way the money flows in the health system: from households, which are the ultimate source of health revenues, through financial intermediaries, which manage budgets, to health care organizations, which provide services to patients (Fig. 1). Based on the revisions we made using the 2011 version, Fig. 2 shows the changes in the mix of tax and contribution sources in the budget of the health insurance fund.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.