Tawjih Aqwal Mufassirin the Methods to Tawfiq Them

Muhammad Auf Norzan Shah,Mohd Faizulamri Mohd Saad

doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i4/9718

Muhammad Auf Norzan Shah, Mohd Faizulamri Mohd Saad

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i4/9718

Copy DOI

Abstract

To tawjih the diverse aqwal mufassirin in the meaning of a verse and the methods of harmonizing it is an issue discussed in the discipline of us?l tafsir. This study focuses on masalik tawjih aqwal al-mufassirin (methods to tawjih the views of mufassirin) and compiling them. This study is important to provide an enlightenment on how researchers in the field of exegesis should cover the diversity of views of mufassirin so as not to ignore the views that are seen as contradictory, whereas there is a method to interpret it according to the discipline of us?l tafsir. The focus of the qualitative literature research in processing and analyzing this data is also seeks to present the methods of al-jam' and tawfiq that can be applied in the researcher's efforts to understand the true meaning of exegeses in line with the requirements of a verse.

Highlights

The scholars of aqwal mufassirin according to the ultimate rules of usūl tafsir by the scholars with manhaj ilmiyyah will find that there is an urgent need to pay attention to the places of ittifaq and ikhtilaf, classify those ikhtilaf, recognize the tawjih and their wujūh wurūd as well as the ways to tawfiq and tarjih between different views
A tafsir are within several situations, including a tafsir that is muttafaq calaih in terms of lafz and meaning, this tafsir is ijmac mufassirin in the text, that is the exegesis of a verse with one minteearnpirnegt,infogr)e‫ ني‬x‫ل‬a‫ضا‬m‫ل‬p‫(ا‬lwe istuhcthhaesCthhreisirtiaagnrseienmtheentvienrsinet:e‫نَي‬rp‫ٓا ِّل‬r‫ض‬eَّ t‫ٱل‬in‫ََل‬g‫غ ر)ِياٱلۡل َمم رغغ ُضضوو ِبب َععلَليري ِهه رمم) َو‬aَ s(Athl-eQJuerw’asna, naldFatihah 1:7) (Al-Khudairi, 1996), or the exegesis that have ikhtilaf upon it
The diversity of views here can be from the type of ikhtilaf tanawwuc which is the difference in terms of diversity such as the ikhtilaf in the use of parable to tacbir a term with different words or the ikhtilaf for an attribute where mufassir expresses an attribute not mentioned by other mufassir, or giving examples of some of the things included under the general instructions or a mufassir states the sabab nuzūl of a verse that are different from other mufassir, or a mufassir gives one of the meanings contained in the lafz musytarak and others

Summary

Introduction

The scholars of aqwal mufassirin (saying of the exegete) according to the ultimate rules of usūl tafsir (priciples of exegeses) by the scholars with manhaj ilmiyyah will find that there is an urgent need (dharūri) to pay attention to the places of ittifaq (concurrence, agreement) and ikhtilaf (differences/disagreement), classify those ikhtilaf, recognize the tawjih and their wujūh wurūd as well as the ways to tawfiq (harmonize/reconcillate) and tarjih between different views. Second: Views in the exegesis of a verse, which are the difference in terms of lafz and meaning and it is not possible to compile and adjust at the same time because of the contradiction. In this case it is necessary to do tarjih such as whether nasakh occurs or not in the multiple views of one verse. May be included in this face, the shadhdhah opinions or views that are not accepted by the verses and contexts such as Baṭiniyyah tafsir

Methods

Discussion

Conclusion