TAUBAT SEBAGAI PENGHAPUS HAD ZINA MENURUT IBNU TAIMIYYAH

Abstract

Scholars differ on whether the repentance of an adulterer can abrogate the punishment of the limit ?. Some scholars state that there is no fall at all, while others state that the punishment is limited to fall. In this regard, Ibn Taymiyyah's opinion is the same as the last opinion that the repentance of an adulterer can remove the demand of the limit as long as it has not been submitted to the ruler, but if it has been submitted to the ruler then the limit does not fall so it remains punished and his repentance is accepted by Allah SWT. As for the research method is qualitative, the type of literature research, research data from library materials in the form of books of jurisprudence, law, and other relevant literature then the data that has been collected, both from primary, secondary, and tertiary data, then analyzed by descriptive-analysis. The results of the study showed that according to Ibn Taymiyyah, the perpetrator of adultery who repented before being complained to the government, fell ḥadd adultery. The perpetrator does not have to admit his actions because the attitude is seen as better. As for the adulterer who repents after being complained to the government, then it does not fall ḥadd adultery. The perpetrator must still be punished, his repentance is accepted by Allah SWT., While the punishment of ḥadd as a consummation of his repentance. The argument used by Ibn Taymiyyah about the fall of ḥadd zina due to repentance refers to the provisions of the QS. al-Nisā 'verse 16, QS. al-Māidah verses 33-34, QS. Ṭāhā verses 121-122, and the hadith narrated by Abū Dawud about the punishment of Maiz. The method of istinbāṭ that he uses tends to use heroic reasoning, that is, looking at the sides and rules of language, general and special relations, cause and effect, and understanding the words of the Qur'an.