Abstract

Based on <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tau$</tex-math></inline-formula> -value concept of cooperative game theory, this paper presents a technique for efficient loss allocation in radial and weakly meshed distribution network (DN). The application of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tau$</tex-math></inline-formula> -value concept requires the quasi-balanced condition to be satisfied by the game. Therefore, with suitable mathematical derivations, it is demonstrated that a DN having only load or only distributed generation (DG) satisfies the necessary quasi-balanced condition. Then, a two-step method to allocate the network losses among loads and DGs is presented. Further, the intensive computational burden involved in <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tau$</tex-math></inline-formula> -value method limits its applicability to practical DN. Therefore, by suitable mathematical analysis, computational complexity associated with <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tau$</tex-math></inline-formula> -value method is reduced. The proposed method is tested on a few possible scenarios of loading, DG penetration, DG location, and X/R ratio in radial and weakly meshed DNs. The results obtained by the proposed <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tau$</tex-math></inline-formula> -value, conventional <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tau$</tex-math></inline-formula> -value, Shapley value and branch current decomposition method are compared based on the attributes of fair and efficient loss allocation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.