Abstract

Using a two-bottle choice test of short duration, we determined taste preference thresholds for eight substances tasting sweet to humans in three chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and four black-handed spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). We found that the chimpanzees significantly preferred concentrations as low as 100–500 mM galactose, 250 mM sorbitol, 0.5–2 mM acesulfame K, 0.5–2.5 mM alitame, 0.5 mM aspartame, 0.2–2 mM sodium saccharin, 0.001–0.2 mM thaumatin, and 0.0025–0.005 mM monellin over tap water. The spider monkeys displayed lower taste preference threshold values, and thus a higher sensitivity than the chimpanzees, with five of the eight substances (2–20 mM galactose, 20–50 mM sorbitol, 0.2–1 mM acesulfame K, 0.002–0.005 mM alitame, and 0.002–0.5 mM sodium saccharin), but were generally unable to perceive the sweetness of the remaining three substances (aspartame, thaumatin, and monellin). The ranking order of sweetening potency of the eight taste substances used here correlates significantly between chimpanzees and humans, but not between spider monkeys and humans. This is in line with genetic findings reporting a higher degree of sequence identity in the Tas1r2 and the Tas1r3 genes coding for the mammalian heterodimer sweet-taste receptor between chimpanzees and humans compared to spider monkeys and humans. Taken together, the findings of the present study support the notion that taste responsiveness for substances tasting sweet to humans may correlate positively with phylogenetic relatedness. At the same time, they are also consistent with the notion that co-evolution between fruit-bearing plants and the sense of taste in animals that serve as their seed dispersers may explain between-species differences in sweet-taste perception.

Highlights

  • Substances tasting sweet to humans comprise an amazing diversity of chemical classes that ranges from simple amino acids over peptides, proteins, and carbohydrates to terpenoids, glycosides, flavonoids, sa­ ponins, sulfonyl amides and dihydrochalcones, to name but a few [31]

  • The chimpanzee study was performed according to a protocol approved by Gothenburg’s Animal Care and Use Committee (Goteborgs djurforsoksetiska namnd, protocol #75–2016), and the spider monkey study was performed according to a protocol approved by the Ethical Board of the Federal Government of Mexico’s Secretariat of Environmental and Natural Resources

  • To determine taste preference thresholds, the animals were given the choice between tap water and defined concentrations of a sweetener dissolved in tap water

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Substances tasting sweet to humans comprise an amazing diversity of chemical classes that ranges from simple amino acids over peptides, proteins, and carbohydrates to terpenoids, glycosides, flavonoids, sa­ ponins, sulfonyl amides and dihydrochalcones, to name but a few [31]. Assessing the sensitivity for taste substances perceived as sweet by humans other than food-associated carbohydrates may allow us to gain further insight into the causes of between-species differences in taste perception and into the mechanisms underlying the evolution of the sense of taste They may allow us to draw further conclusions as to the structural properties of sweet-tasting ligands that may affect their affinity to the mammalian sweet-taste receptor. It was the aim of the present study to determine taste preference thresholds in two species of nonhuman primates for eight substances perceived as sweet by humans.

Animals
Ethical note
Taste Stimuli
Procedure
Data analysis
Spider monkeys
Chimpanzees
Between-species comparisons of taste preference thresholds
Sweetening potency and the sweet-taste receptor
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call