Abstract

What is the central question of the study? Are corticospinal responses to acute and short-term squat resistance training task-specific? What is the main finding and its importance? A single bout of resistance training increased spinal excitability, but no changes in corticospinal responses were noted following 4weeks of squat training despite task-specific increases in strength. The present data suggest that processes along the corticospinal pathway of the knee extensors play a limited role in the task-specific increase in strength following resistance training. Neural adaptations subserving strength increases have been shown to be task-specific, but responses and adaptation to lower-limb compound exercises such as the squat are commonly assessed in a single-limb isometric task. This two-part study assessed neuromuscular responses to an acute bout (Study A) and 4weeks (Study B) of squat resistance training at 80% of one-repetition-maximum, with measures taken during a task-specific isometric squat (IS) and non-specific isometric knee extension (KE). Eighteen healthy volunteers (25±5years) were randomised into either a training (n=10) or a control (n=8) group. Neural responses were evoked at the intracortical, corticospinal and spinal levels, and muscle thickness was assessed using ultrasound. The results of Study A showed that the acute bout of squat resistance training decreased maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) for up to 45min post-exercise (-23%, P<0.001). From 15-45min post-exercise, spinally evoked responses were increased in both tasks (P=0.008); however, no other evoked responses were affected (P≥0.240). Study B demonstrated that following short-term resistance training, participants improved their one repetition maximum squat (+35%, P<0.001), which was reflected by a task-specific increase in IS MVC (+49%, P=0.001), but not KE (+1%, P=0.882). However, no training-induced changes were observed in muscle thickness (P=0.468) or any evoked responses (P=0.141). Adjustments in spinal motoneuronal excitability are evident after acute resistance training. After a period of short-term training, there were no changes in the responses to central nervous system stimulation, which suggests that alterations in corticospinal properties of the vastus lateralis might not contribute to increases in strength.

Highlights

  • Adaptations of neural function in response to resistance training play an important role in the development of strength, in the early stages (

  • No evidence exists in the lower limbs regarding the optimal stimulus variables for long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), and whilst it is noted that the responses to pairedpulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using 100 ms interstimulus interval (ISI) might represent both spinal and intracortical inhibition (McNeil, Martin, Gandevia, & Taylor, 2011), pilot testing on 10 participants determined that, in the vastus lateralis (VL), using an ISI of 100 ms elicits the smallest unconditioned to conditioned MEP ratio (59.5 ± 26.8%) compared to 150 and 200 ms (151.5 ± 70.4 and 105.6 ± 24.2%, respectively, F1.2,10.6 = 10.8, P = 0.001)

  • Variability of measures was lower in Study A compared to Study B, and tended to be lower in the knee extension (KE) task in Study A, whereas it was lower in the isometric squat (IS) task in Study B (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Adaptations of neural function in response to resistance training play an important role in the development of strength, in the early stages (

Ethical approval
Participants
Experimental design
Study A: responses to an acute training session
Study B: responses to short-term training
Training protocol
Isometric knee extension
Isometric squat
Electromyography
2.10 Percutaneous nerve stimulation
2.11 Electrical spinal tract stimulation
2.12 Transcranial magnetic stimulation
2.13 Ultrasound
2.14 Data analysis
Background
2.15 Statistical analysis
Test–retest reliability of measures
Responses to acute resistance training
Responses to short-term lower-limb compound resistance training
Further considerations
Limitations
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call