Abstract

BackgroundCurrent health policy states that patients with osteoarthritis (OA) should mainly be managed in primary health care. Still, research shows that patients with hand OA have poor access to recommended treatment in primary care, and in Norway, they are increasingly referred to rheumatologist consultations in specialist care. In this randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, we will test if a new model, where patients referred to consultation in specialist health care receive their first consultation by an occupational therapy (OT) specialist, is as safe and effective as the traditional model, where they receive their first consultation by a rheumatologist. More specifically, we will answer the following questions:What are the characteristics of patients with hand OA referred to specialist health care with regards to joint affection, disease activity, symptoms and function?Is OT-led hand OA care as effective and safe as rheumatologist-led care with respect to treatment response, disease activity, symptoms, function and patient satisfaction?Is OT-led hand OA care equal to, or more cost effective than rheumatologist-led care?Which factors, regardless of hand OA care, predict improvement 6 and 12 months after baseline?MethodsParticipants will be patients with hand OA diagnosed by a general practitioner and referred for consultation at one of two Norwegian departments of rheumatology. Those who agree will attend a clinical assessment and report their symptoms and function in validated outcome measures, before they are randomly selected to receive their first consultation by an OT specialist (n = 200) or by a rheumatologist (n = 200). OTs may refer patients to a rheumatologist consultation and vice versa. The primary outcome will be the number of patients classified as OMERACT/OARSI-responders after six months. Secondary outcomes are pain, function and satisfaction with care over the twelve-month trial period. The analysis of the primary outcome will be done by logistic regression. A two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference in response probability will be formed, and non-inferiority of OT-led care will be claimed if the upper endpoint of this interval does not exceed 15%.DiscussionThe findings will improve access to evidence-based management of people with hand OA.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03102788. Registered April 6th, 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03102788?term=Kjeken&draw=2&rank=1Date and version identifier:December 17th, 2020. First version.

Highlights

  • Current health policy states that patients with osteoarthritis (OA) should mainly be managed in primary health care

  • The results showed that 7 of the 24 participants, who ordinarily would have been seen by a rheumatologist, needed a short rheumatologist consultation following their occupational therapy (OT) consultation, thereby saving 21.5 rheumatologist hours

  • Aims and research questions In this randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, we will test if a new model, where patients referred to consultation in specialist health care receive their first consultation by an OT specialist, is as safe, effective and cost-effective as the traditional model, where they receive their first consultation by a rheumatologist

Read more

Summary

Methods

Participants will be patients with hand OA diagnosed by a general practitioner and referred for consultation at one of two Norwegian departments of rheumatology. Those who agree will attend a clinical assessment and report their symptoms and function in validated outcome measures, before they are randomly selected to receive their first consultation by an OT specialist (n = 200) or by a rheumatologist (n = 200). OTs may refer patients to a rheumatologist consultation and vice versa. The primary outcome will be the number of patients classified as OMERACT/OARSI-responders after six months. Function and satisfaction with care over the twelve-month trial period. A two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference in response probability will be formed, and noninferiority of OT-led care will be claimed if the upper endpoint of this interval does not exceed 15%

Discussion
Background
Methods/design
Findings
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.