Abstract

Selecting a target based on a representation in visual working memory (VWM) affords biasing covert attention towards objects with memory-matching features. Recently, we showed that even task-irrelevant features of a VWM template bias attention. Specifically, when participants had to saccade to a cued shape, distractors sharing the cue’s search-irrelevant color captured the eyes. While a saccade always aims at one target location, multiple locations can be attended covertly. Here, we investigated whether covert attention is captured similarly as the eyes. In our partial report task, each trial started with a shape-defined search cue, followed by a fixation cross. Next, two colored shapes, each including a letter, appeared left and right from fixation, followed by masks. The letter inside that shape matching the preceding cue had to be reported. In Experiment 1, either target, distractor, both, or no object matched the cue’s irrelevant color. Target-letter reports were most frequent in target-match trials and least frequent in distractor-match trials. Irrelevant cue and target color never matched in Experiment 2. Still, participants reported the distractor more often to the target’s disadvantage, when cue and distractor color matched. Thus, irrelevant features of a VWM template can influence covert attention in an involuntarily object-based manner when searching for trial-wise varying targets.

Highlights

  • Representations we are keeping briefly in memory can influence how we allocate our attention towards objects in the environment [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • We investigated whether a target object whose representation should be kept in visual working memory (VWM) for the consecutive search task will bias covert attention in an involuntarily object-based manner

  • In order to test this hypothesis, we investigated the influence of a task-irrelevant feature of a trial-wise varying search-target cue within a trailing partial report task that required to report a letter inside a target object in an unspeeded manner

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Representations we are keeping briefly in memory can influence how we allocate our attention towards objects in the environment [1,2,3,4,5,6] This has been proven by several studies showing that objects matching a current visual working memory (VWM) representation capture our attention more strongly than objects that are currently not maintained in VWM [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. While search targets matching the VWM representation decreased search times, matching distractors prolonged search times. This was interpreted as obligatory attentional capture by WM contents.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call