Abstract

For Instruction, teachers often rely on prefabricated material that may include irrelevant information. However, graphs can place a heavy burden on the cognitive system if their complexity is not suitable for a given task. In this study, we compared bar graphs showing task-irrelevant data points or task-irrelevant data series with a control condition using a within-subject design and eye tracking methodology. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results show that task-irrelevant data significantly elevated processing time, error rate and cognitive load. Even though perceptual grouping by color was expected to aid the process when a task-irrelevant data series was included in a graph, effects were strongest in this condition. Analyses of attention distribution using eye tracking measures revealed that task processing differed qualitatively between the conditions, yielding important implications for instruction.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call