Abstract

This paper proposes a task-driven computational framework for assessing diffusion MRI experimental designs which, rather than relying on parameter-estimation metrics, directly measures quantitative task performance. Traditional computational experimental design (CED) methods may be ill-suited to experimental tasks, such as clinical classification, where outcome does not depend on parameter-estimation accuracy or precision alone. Current assessment metrics evaluate experiments’ ability to faithfully recover microstructural parameters rather than their task performance. The method we propose addresses this shortcoming. For a given MRI experimental design (protocol, parameter-estimation method, model, etc.), experiments are simulated start-to-finish and task performance is computed from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and associated summary metrics (e.g. area under the curve (AUC)). Two experiments were performed: first, a validation of the pipeline’s task performance predictions against clinical results, comparing in-silico predictions to real-world ROC/AUC; and second, a demonstration of the pipeline’s advantages over traditional CED approaches, using two simulated clinical classification tasks. Comparison with clinical datasets validates our method’s predictions of (a) the qualitative form of ROC curves, (b) the relative task performance of different experimental designs, and (c) the absolute performance (AUC) of each experimental design. Furthermore, we show that our method outperforms traditional task-agnostic assessment methods, enabling improved, more useful experimental design. Our pipeline produces accurate, quantitative predictions of real-world task performance. Compared to current approaches, such task-driven assessment is more likely to identify experimental designs that perform well in practice. Our method is not limited to diffusion MRI; the pipeline generalises to any task-based quantitative MRI application, and provides the foundation for developing future task-driven end-to end CED frameworks.

Highlights

  • When planning quantitative diffusion MRI experiments, investigators can select from a range of acquisition and analysis parameters, such as diffusion model, acquisition protocol, and parameter-estimation method

  • Example: absolute performance (AUC) computed from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves output as summary metric of I1 task performance associated with I3 experimental design and I2 tissue

  • Our pipeline mirrored real-world experimental design choices (Table 1): tasks involved classifying mean region of interest (ROI) parameter estimates as belonging to one of two SpA subtypes, task performance was assessed with ROC curves and associated AUCs, and data was synthesised from the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model: SðbÞ 1⁄4 feÀ bðDfastþDslowÞ þ ð1 À f ÞeÀ bDslow ð1Þ

Read more

Summary

–Introduction

When planning quantitative diffusion MRI (dMRI) experiments, investigators can select from a range of acquisition and analysis parameters, such as diffusion model, acquisition protocol, and parameter-estimation method. Example: AUC computed from ROC curves output as summary metric of I1 task performance associated with I3 experimental design and I2 tissue In this way, for a given I1-I3, the pipeline outputs a prediction of associated task performance. In contrast to traditional approaches, our pipeline does not automatically reject high-bias, low-variance signal models These models, which describe tissues less accurately than ‘ground-truth’ models (I2), may increase task performance, especially in settings where effect size depends more strongly on precision and repeatability than microstructural fidelity. Since the relative performance of different fitting algorithms may vary on a parameterby-parameter basis [32,34,35], the optimal fitting method may vary between tasks within a single tissue type This kind of task-specific assessment is inaccessible to current CED approaches

–Methods
Active
–Discussion & conclusions
–Limitations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call