Abstract

In art schools and classes for art history students are trained to pay attention to different aspects of an artwork, such as art movement characteristics and painting techniques. Experts are better at processing style and visual features of an artwork than nonprofessionals. Here we tested the hypothesis that experts in art use different, task-dependent viewing strategies than nonprofessionals when analyzing a piece of art. We compared a group of art history students with a group of students with no art education background, while viewing 36 paintings under three discrimination tasks. Participants were asked to determine the art movement, the date and the medium of the paintings. We analyzed behavioral and eye-movement data of 27 participants. Our observers adjusted their viewing strategies according to the task, resulting in longer fixation durations and shorter saccade amplitudes for the medium detection task. We found higher task accuracy and subjective confidence, less congruence and higher dispersion in fixation locations in experts. Expertise also influenced saccade metrics, biasing it towards larger saccade amplitudes, advocating a more holistic scanning strategy of experts in all three tasks.

Highlights

  • Task-driven selectionIt is widely agreed that visual attention is on one hand stimulus-driven, induced by the physical properties of an image, referred to as salience, categorized as bottom-up processing

  • Participants of this study had most difficulties with dating the paintings correctly (M = 0.30, SD = 0.46) and were comparably accurate in the tasks – art movement (M = 0.48, SD = 0.50) and medium (M = 0.49, SD = 0.50). These differences in accuracy between groups and tasks were reflected in the subjective confidence ratings

  • We found task-induced differences in fixation durations and saccade amplitudes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is widely agreed that visual attention is on one hand stimulus-driven, induced by the physical properties of an image, referred to as salience, categorized as bottom-up processing. Top-down demands like current goals, task, knowledge, expectations and reward direct our attention (for review see Schütz et al, 2011; Tatler et al, 2011). Received July 30, 2020; Published December 16, 2020. Task-Dependent Eye-Movement Patterns in Viewing Art. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 13(2):.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call