Abstract

Visual object processing may follow a coarse-to-fine sequence imposed by fast processing of low spatial frequencies (LSF) and slow processing of high spatial frequencies (HSF). Objects can be categorized at varying levels of specificity: the superordinate (e.g. animal), the basic (e.g. dog), or the subordinate (e.g. Border Collie). We tested whether superordinate and more specific categorization depend on different spatial frequency ranges, and whether any such dependencies might be revealed by or influence signals recorded using EEG. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) and time-frequency (TF) analysis to examine the time course of object processing while participants performed either a grammatical gender-classification task (which generally forces basic-level categorization) or a living/non-living judgement (superordinate categorization) on everyday, real-life objects. Objects were filtered to contain only HSF or LSF. We found a greater positivity and greater negativity for HSF than for LSF pictures in the P1 and N1 respectively, but no effects of task on either component. A later, fronto-central negativity (N350) was more negative in the gender-classification task than the superordinate categorization task, which may indicate that this component relates to semantic or syntactic processing. We found no significant effects of task or spatial frequency on evoked or total gamma band responses. Our results demonstrate early differences in processing of HSF and LSF content that were not modulated by categorization task, with later responses reflecting such higher-level cognitive factors.

Highlights

  • A central goal of vision is to recognize objects rapidly and efficiently

  • Object recognition may be accomplished through a rapid, automatic cascade of feedforward [1] and feedback [2] operations that culminate in the matching of a processed retinal image to an object representation stored in memory [3]

  • In a prominent model of the differing roles of low (LSFs) and high spatial frequencies (HSFs) in object recognition proposed by Bar [2,9,10], low spatial frequencies (LSF) are rapidly projected to frontal cortices via the magnocellular pathway

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Object recognition may be accomplished through a rapid, automatic cascade of feedforward [1] and feedback [2] operations that culminate in the matching of a processed retinal image to an object representation stored in memory [3]. One general organizing principle of the categorization process may be that it follows a coarse-to-fine sequence imposed by processing of different spatial frequencies at different rates in different visual pathways [4,5]. Many aspects of visual categorization have been shown to follow a general coarse-tofine, low-to-high spatial frequency sequence [6,7,8]. In a prominent model of the differing roles of low (LSFs) and high spatial frequencies (HSFs) in object recognition proposed by Bar [2,9,10], LSFs are rapidly projected to frontal cortices via the magnocellular pathway. How might LSFs play such a role in this processing sequence?

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call