Abstract

Despite half-century old, but comprehensive national and international guidance, evidence of clinical effectiveness and widespread agreement on management of risk factors along with sophisticated measures for primary and secondary prevention of major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular disease remains the dominant cause of death and disability world-wide. Life style changes at population-level (e.g., lower salt and saturated fat consumption or reduced/banned amount of industrially-produced trans fatty acids in specific products, etc.) or changes at individual level (e.g., targeting modifiable risk factors/life style changes affecting smoking/tobacco use, poor diet, high blood cholesterol, high blood pressure, insufficient physical activity, overweight/obesity) have reduced coronary heart disease mortality to variable extent in different countries (mostly so reported in Finland, Iceland and Sweden) at the beginning of the new century. Overall, however, cardiovascular mortality is estimated to increase in the next coming years until 2030 at a cost exceeding US $1044 billion. Several decades of status quo are also noted in the therapeutic spectrum of cardiovascular disease, mainly consisting of variations to LDL-C lowering agents, antihypertensives, anticoagulants, antiplatelets and fibrinolytics. Most of the therapeutic interventions are “tertiary” in nature (probably some 60%), meaning that treatment is instituted once the individual has developed a pathologic condition; “secondary prevention” may cover some 25% - 30% (meant to prevent re-occurrence of the condition or occurrence of complications) while “primary prevention” is left with 10% - 15% share (most commonly implying life style changes at individual level and rarely pharmacological intervention). For almost three decades, the so-called inflammatory hypothesis has been promoted as a reasonable pathogenetic theory behind initiation and growth of atherosclerotic plaque (Alexander RW, 1994; Ross R, 1999). With the discovery of molecular and cellular pathways that promote atherosclerosis and the role of cytokines as inflammatory messengers, the concept as such—inflammation, has received a primordial role in atherogenesis. The present review paper aims at ascertaining the role of inflammation as a common pathogenetic denominator of cardiovascular disease in patients primarily treated for their psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis.

Highlights

  • Cardiovascular disease remains a massive public health problem world-wide as disease entities clustering under a common umbrella most commonly managed by cardiologists, and as major comorbidities associated to skin and joint disease in patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis

  • Whether psoriasis initiates the systemic inflammatory march [1] or acts as an amplifier of inflammatory processes in patients with known metabolic disorders, the latter being a scenario that seems to bring about more severe consequences, the ultimate result is a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity and smoking, and considerably increased risk of developing severe vascular events [2]-[41]

  • The findings suggest that psoriasis-affected skin lesions program interleukin-17-producing T cells in draining lymph nodes to distal skin and later to arteries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease remains a massive public health problem world-wide as disease entities clustering under a common umbrella most commonly managed by cardiologists, and as major comorbidities associated to skin and joint disease in patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis. The association between chronic use of methotrexate and decreased risk of ischemic cardiovascular events (CVE) among patients with psoriatic or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was investigated using a systematic review and meta-analysis [64] This meta-analysis was based on seven observational studies with MACE as endpoint and C-reactive protein as surrogate parameter, the “well-known marker of systemic inflammation” [65]. Given the uncertainties inherent in observational trials, Ridker et al (2013) have mounted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of low-dose methotrexate or matching placebo in 4786 patients with previous myocardial infarction or multivessel coronary disease who had either type 2 diabetes or the metabolic syndrome—the CIRT Trial [66] This trial set out to test the changes in CRP as well as in interleukin-1β and interleukin-6 compared to baseline.

Pater DOI
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call