Targeting the ErbB/MAPK Signaling Cascade in Canine Bladder Cancer Cell Lines

Abstract

Canine transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder accounts for 2% of diagnosed canine cancers. Most TCCs are inoperable and unresponsive to traditional chemotherapy. Median survival time is typically less than a year for all treatments indicating a need for more effective therapies. Recent studies have discovered that approximately 70% of canine TCCs harbor mutations in the proto‐oncogene BRAF, a kinase involved in the mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway that controls cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. BRAF mutations are present in several human cancers, most of which exhibit adaptive or intrinsic resistance to BRAF‐targeted inhibitors. The goals of this study were to (1) further characterize the role of mutant BRAF in canine TCC and (2) determine whether inhibition of the MAPK pathway alone or in combination with other gene targets may be an effective therapy for TCC treatment.Analysis of ERK1/2 phosphorylation following serum starvation indicates that TCC cell lines exhibit constitutive MAPK pathway activation independent of their BRAF mutation status. MAPK activity was further quantified using gene expression analysis of ten MAPK target genes, revealing that TCC cell lines have significantly higher MAPK pathway activity compared to other canine cancer cell lines. These data suggest a causative role for MAPK signaling in TCC pathogenesis. To determine whether the MAPK pathway could be a therapeutic target for TCC treatment we assessed the effect of BRAF and MEK inhibition on TCC cell proliferation and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Four BRAF mutant human cell lines with varying degrees of sensitivity to BRAF‐targeted agents were used to determine the relative sensitivity of canine TCC cell lines. BRAF mutant TCC cell lines were sensitive to BRAF inhibition with the “paradox‐breaking” inhibitor PLX7904 (IC50: 0.2–1.2μM), but not vemurafenib (IC50: 7–21μM). Both BRAF wild type and mutant TCC cell lines were sensitive to MEK inhibition with selumetinib (IC50: 15–420nM) and trametinib (IC50: 0.4–8nM). ERK1/2 phosphorylation decreased after 6‐hour treatments with MAPK inhibitors, but rebounded by 24 hours suggesting the presence of resistance mechanisms. Microarray analysis indicated that the ErbB family of receptors and ligands are up‐regulated in TCC cell lines relative to other canine cancer cell lines (fold‐change > 2, q < 0.05). Combined BRAF and ErbB inhibition synergized in the BRAF mutant Bliley TCC cell line, while combined MEK and ErbB inhibition synergized in both Bliley and BRAF wild type Kinsey cells. These findings suggest that targeting ErbB receptors with MAPK inhibition is a potential therapy for canine TCC treatment. Additionally, our data indicate that canine TCC may serve as a naturally‐occurring model for the study of resistance mechanisms to MAPK inhibition in human cancers.Support or Funding InformationMorris Animal Foundation, Shipley University Chair in Comparative OncologyThis abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.