Abstract

Objectives: To assess the level of female participation in blood donation at a blood bank of a developing nation and compare findings with that of other parts of the world. Background: Safe blood is the foundation of good blood transfusion practice and voluntary non remunerated donors (VNRD) are the cornerstone. There is therefore always a quest for VNRDs, in order to boost the blood transfusion service. Safe blood practice is not optimal in many developing nations mostly for lack of VNRDs. Female donors are also rarely blood donors in this setting. It may therefore be productive to target this group as a source of VNRDs. Methods: A retrospective study of blood donors who have been screened for transfusion transmitted infections was carried out at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Information was obtained from the donor registry of the blood bank from January 2013 - June 2014. Results: There were 8,619 donors, of which 90.1% and 9.9% were male and female respectively. Family replacement donors accounted for 84.7% of the donors and 15.3% were VNRD. Female donors were 7.9% and 21% of FRD and VNRD respectively. The odds of a female being a VNRD was higher than for a male, 0.48 vs. 0.16 (OR=3, 95%CI= 2.56-3.51). Conclusion: Females have more potentials of being voluntary donors than males; they should therefore be targeted in improving blood donation in developing countries. There is also the need to explore reasons why females do not regularly donate in this setting and address such.

Highlights

  • Human blood is essential to life and millions of lives are saved globally by blood transfusion

  • Females have more potentials of being voluntary donors than males; they should be targeted in improving blood donation in developing countries

  • Reasons that have been proffered for these gender differences include prevalence of iron deficiency and pernicious anaemia, low body weight among prospective female donors and a higher rate of adverse reactions to blood donation related to body weight, erroneous beliefs, low level of education and cultural factors among women [2,3,4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human blood is essential to life and millions of lives are saved globally by blood transfusion. Reasons that have been proffered for these gender differences include prevalence of iron deficiency and pernicious anaemia, low body weight among prospective female donors and a higher rate of adverse reactions to blood donation related to body weight (e.g. dizziness, fainting), erroneous beliefs, low level of education and cultural factors among women [2,3,4]. These can result in deferral at the blood donation centres or to self exclusion by prospective female donors. It may be productive to target this group as a source of VNRDs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.