Abstract

In this report, we describe the inactivation and site-specific light induction of plasmid expression using a photosensitive caging compound. Plasmids coding for luciferase were caged with 1-(4, 5-dimethoxy-2-nitrophenyl)diazoethane (DMNPE) and transfected into approximately 1-cm diameter sites of the skin of rats with particle bombardment. Skin sites transfected with caged plasmids did not express luciferase. However, subsequent exposure of transfected skin sites to 355-nm laser light induced luciferase expression in proportion to the amount of light. Liposome transfection of HeLa cells with DMNPE-caged green fluorescent protein (GFP) plasmids showed similar results. Caging DNA with DMNPE blocks expression at the level of transcription, since in vitro production of mRNA from linearized GFP plasmid was also blocked by caging and subsequently restored by exposure to light. Under the reaction conditions of these experiments, our absorbance data indicate that each DMNPE-caged GFP plasmid contains approximately 270 caging groups. In addition to inhibition and subsequent restoration of plasmid bioactivity, the presence and photocleavage of this relatively small number of cage groups also alters electrophoretic mobility of plasmids and optical absorption characteristics. This light-induced expression strategy provides a new means to target the expression of genetic material with spatial and temporal specificity.

Highlights

  • Spectral Scans—Fig. 1 shows the similarity of the absorbance spectra of DMNPE-caged pGFP plasmid prepared for these studies and DMNPE-caged ATP obtained from Molecular Probes

  • In Vivo Results—Luciferase expression of skin sites transfected with caged plasmid is equal to background levels measured in nontransfected skin

  • Plasmids coding for luciferase were caged with 1-(4,5dimethoxy-2-nitrophenyl)diazoethane and transfected into ϳ1-cm diameter sites of rat skin with gold particle bombardment [21]

Read more

Summary

Targeting Expression with Light Using Caged DNA*

(Received for publication, December 24, 1998, and in revised form, April 20, 1999). W. Skin sites transfected with caged plasmids did not express luciferase. In addition to inhibition and subsequent restoration of plasmid bioactivity, the presence and photocleavage of this relatively small number of cage groups alters electrophoretic mobility of plasmids and optical absorption characteristics. This light-induced expression strategy provides a new means to target the expression of genetic material with spatial and temporal specificity. To achieve site-specific expression, a strategy permitting spatially targeted induction is needed. Application of caging chemistry to plasmid DNA offers the possibility of light-activated expression after delivery to cells, and since light exposure can be spatially controlled, this photoactivation approach has the potential to produce targeted expression. Most current induction strategies add factors to the cellular milieu to control

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Targeting Expression with Light Using Caged DNA
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call