Targeting CAR to the Peptide-MHC Complex Reveals Distinct Signaling Compared to That of TCR in a Jurkat T Cell Model.

Abstract

Simple SummaryChimeric antigen receptors (CARs) redirect T cells without the need for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction. CARs are designed based on T cell receptor (TCR) signaling and the recognition specificities of antibodies. This technology has achieved great clinical success in combatting cancers. Despite these successes, the mechanism of CAR signaling in the T cell and how this can impact function is not fully understood. To enhance our understanding and to identify the characteristics of CAR signaling, we designed a CAR to target a peptide-MHC complex, similar to the TCR. This allowed us to compare CAR and TCR head-to-head, such that novel traits of CAR signaling could be discovered. We found that CAR has distinct signaling characteristics compared to TCR, including the molecules that facilitate signal transduction. These findings offer explanations for the clinical behavior of CAR T cells (CAR-T) therapy and avenues to optimize the technology.Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) utilize T cell receptor (TCR) signaling cascades and the recognition functions of antibodies. This allows T cells, normally restricted by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), to be redirected to target cells by their surface antigens, such as tumor associated antigens (TAAs). CAR-T technology has achieved significant successes in treatment of certain cancers, primarily liquid cancers. Nonetheless, many challenges hinder development of this therapy, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the efficacy of CAR-T treatments for solid tumors. These challenges show our inadequate understanding of this technology, particularly regarding CAR signaling, which has been less studied. To dissect CAR signaling, we designed a CAR that targets an epitope from latent membrane protein 2 A (LMP2 A) of the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) presented on HLA*A02:01. Because of this, CAR and TCR signaling can be compared directly, allowing us to study the involvement of other signaling molecules, such as coreceptors. This comparison revealed that CAR was sufficient to bind monomeric antigens due to its high affinity but required oligomeric antigens for its activation. CAR sustained the transduced signal significantly longer, but at a lower magnitude, than did TCR. CD8 coreceptor was recruited to the CAR synapse but played a negligible role in signaling, unlike for TCR signaling. The distinct CAR signaling processes could provide explanations for clinical behavior of CAR-T therapy and suggest ways to improve the technology.