Abstract

Identification of sepsis is a major issue due to limitations in diagnosis and severity of outcome. Different combinations of tests are used to screen babies at risk for infection, none specific enough to avoid treatment of non- infected newborns. 193 newborns with � 35 weeks of gestational age admitted in the maternity were screened for infection using a protocol scoring system involving haematological values and CRP � 10mg/l. Blood-cultures were taken after treatment decision, before antibiotics were started. No microbiological exam was included in the screening. Treatment decisions were taken by the staff irrespectively of the ongoing observational study. Newborns were classified by the authors in 4 groups: infected (culture verified), strongly suspected infection (SSI), no sepsis but treated (NST), no sepsis-no treatment (NSNT). Treatment decision was revaluated by the authors according to different cut-off levels of CRP. 40 newborns (20.7%) received antibiotics. 2 had positive blood-cultures. 13 were classified as SSI (all treated) and 178 as not infected (25 treated). All infected babies were identified but the error of the positive predictive value reached 62.5%. Revaluation of treatment decisions with CRP cut-off levels of 15, 20 and 25 mg/l showed respectively 60.5%, 51.6 and 48% of error of the positive predictive value, the first two cut-offs missing no infected newborns but the last one missing two. A new scoring system including CRP at 20mg/l has been in use since then without readmissions for infection and an estimated reduction of 24% antibiotic treatment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.