Abstract

BackgroundRNA‐based sequencing is considered ideal for detecting pathogenic fusion‐genes compared to DNA‐based assays and provides valuable information about the relative expression of driver genes. However, RNA from formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue has issues with both quantity and quality, making RNA‐based sequencing difficult in clinical practice. Analyzing stamp‐derived RNA with next‐generation sequencing (NGS) can address the above‐mentioned obstacles. In this study, we validated the analytical specifications and clinical performance of our custom panel for RNA‐based assays on the Ion Torrent platform.MethodsTo evaluate our custom RNA lung panel, we first examined the gene sequences of RNA derived from 35 NSCLC tissues with diverse backgrounds by conventional methods and NGS. Next, we moved to the clinical phase, where clinical samples (all stamp‐derived RNA) were used to examine variants. In the clinical phase we conducted an NGS analysis while simultaneously applying conventional approaches to assess the feasibility and validity of the panel in clinical practice.ResultsIn the prerun phase, all of the variants confirmed with conventional methods were detected by NGS. In the clinical phase, a total of 80 patients were enrolled and 80 tumor specimens were sequenced from February 2018 to December 2018. There were 66 cases in which the RNA concentration was too low to be measured, but sequencing was successful in the vast majority of cases. The concordance between NGS and conventional methods was 95.0%.ConclusionsRNA extraction using stamp specimens and panel sequencing by NGS were considered applicable in clinical settings.Key points Significant findings of the study Next‐generation sequencing using RNA from stamp specimens was able to detect driver gene changes in non‐small cell lung cancer including fusion genes with the same accuracy as conventional methods. What this study adds Using RNA from stamp specimens obtained from biopsy increases the number of candidate cases for RNA sequencing in clinical settings.

Highlights

  • Various targeted agents have been developed for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and fusion gene evaluation is recommended as a standard test for the evaluation of advanced NSCLC.[1,2]

  • For some types of driver mutations, RNA-based sequencing provides valuable information concerning the relative expression of driver genes

  • For the validation of the custom RNA lung panel, we examined the gene sequences of RNA derived from 35 NSCLC tissues with diverse backgrounds by conventional methods and next-generation sequencing (NGS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Various targeted agents have been developed for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and fusion gene evaluation (eg, ALK, ROS1 and NTRK) is recommended as a standard test for the evaluation of advanced NSCLC.[1,2] An RNA-based assay is considered ideal for detecting pathogenic fusion genes compared with a DNA-based assay, as cancer-forming driver fusion genes undergo transcription more efficiently than nonfunctioning passenger fusion genes.[3]. The degeneration of RNA inevitably occurs through the process of routine formalin fixation and paraffin embedding. Another concern is that many genetic loci need to be tested simultaneously, and the number of genetic changes to investigate is still increasing. RNA-based sequencing is considered ideal for detecting pathogenic fusion-genes compared to DNA-based assays and provides valuable information about the relative expression of driver genes. Methods: To evaluate our custom RNA lung panel, we first examined the gene sequences of RNA derived from 35 NSCLC tissues with diverse backgrounds by conventional methods and NGS. Conclusions: RNA extraction using stamp specimens and panel sequencing by NGS were considered applicable in clinical settings

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call