Abstract

Simple SummaryOrgan preservation is becoming a topic of great interest for rectal cancer. Radiotherapy, often in association with chemotherapy, is playing a major role in achieving tumor sterilization and long-term local control. In order to achieve this goal, a high dose (>70 Gy) of radiotherapy is necessary. To avoid radiation toxicity of such a high dose, an endocavitary approach using contact X-ray 50 kV brachytherapy (CXB) is an attractive method. Historical series and two randomized trials in Europe give good evidence of the merit of CXB. The selection of early tumors is a key prognostic factor to achieve good results. A planned organ preservation treatment using CXB followed by chemoradiotherapy can be proposed to patients with T2–T3 a–b < 3 cm in diameter. At 3 years, the chance of local control should be close to 90% with good bowel function.Rectal adenocarcinoma is a quite radioresistant tumor. In order to achieve non-operative management (NOM) radiotherapy plays a major role. Targeted radiotherapy aiming at high precision 3D radiotherapy uses stereotactic image-guided external beam radiotherapy machines. To further safely increase the tumor dose, endocavitary brachytherapy (ECB) is an original approach. There are two different ways to perform such an ECB: contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) using a 50 kV X-ray generator with an X-ray tube positioned under eye guidance into the rectal cavity and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) using iridium-192 sources positioned into the rectal cavity under image guidance. This study focused on CXB. CXB uses a small mobile generator that produces 50 kV X-rays with limited penetration. This technique is well adapted to accessible tumors of limited size and especially needs a high dose rate (≥15 Gy/minutes) for rectal tumors. It is performed on an ambulatory basis. A total dose between 80–110 Gy is delivered in 3–4 fractions over 3 to 6 weeks into a small volume (5 cm3). CXB was pioneered in the 1970s by Papillon using the Philips RT 50TM. Since 2009, the Papillon P50TM has been used in 11 institutions in Europe. The OPERA Phase III trial tested the hypothesis that a CXB boost (90 Gy/3 fr) compared to an EBRT boost (9 Gy/5 fr) for T2–T3 ab < 5 cm and N0–N1 < 8 mm will increase the 3-year organ preservation (OP) rate when combined with 45 Gy/5 weeks with concomitant capecitabine. Out of more than 300 patients with tumors < 3 cm (1962–1992), Papillon reported a long-term local control close to 85%. Similar results were published in Europe and USA at that time. The Lyon R96-2 Phase III trial (2004) demonstrated that, when combined with preoperative EBRT, a CXB boost (90 Gy/3 fr) significantly increased the rate of clinical complete response (cCR) and sphincter preservation, with some patients having OP at 10 years. With more than 2000 patients treated in Europe (2010–2020) using the Papillon 50TM, organ preservation appears possible in close to 80% of cases in selected early T2–T3. The OPERA trial closed after 141 inclusions (2015–2020) after an independent data monitoring committee recommendation because of promising results. At the 2-year follow-up (blinded data), the rate of cCR and OP were 77% and 72%, respectively, for the 141 tumors, and for T < 3 cm (61 pts), they were 86% and 85%, respectively, with good bowel function. The final results should be available in 2022. Organ preservation using NOM appears to be a promising approach for rectal cancer. A CXB boost with chemoradiotherapy in selected early T2–T3 could become an attractive option to achieve a planned OP. This approach should be proposed to well-informed patients after discussion in an MDT.

Highlights

  • For more than a century, the aim of radiation therapy has always been, on one hand, to deliver 100% of the “prescribed dose” into the tumor volume (GTV) or into the CTV when irradiating “sub-clinical” malignant disease and, on the other hand, to deliver the lowest dose in the normal surrounding normal tissues, often specified as the “organ at risk” (OAR)

  • It is interesting to notice that, as early as the 1920s, brachytherapy using radium tubes or needles was a great improvement in terms of targeted radiation therapy (TRT) for accessible tumors

  • Trial included 88 operable patients presenting distal rectal T2–T3 stage tumors using endorectal ultrasound (ERUS), who were treated with preoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (39 Gy/13 fr/3 weeks) followed by TME surgery

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For more than a century, the aim of radiation therapy has always been, on one hand, to deliver 100% of the “prescribed dose” into the tumor (gross visible) volume (GTV) or into the CTV (clinical target volume) when irradiating “sub-clinical” malignant disease and, on the other hand, to deliver the lowest dose (if possible 0%) in the normal surrounding normal tissues, often specified as the “organ at risk” (OAR). The use of TeleCobalt in the 1960s was a major breakthrough to spare skin (when compared to a 200 kV generator). This was further improved with a linear accelerator and “image- and computer-guided” radiotherapy in the 1990s. It is interesting to notice that, as early as the 1920s, brachytherapy using radium tubes or needles was a great improvement in terms of targeted radiation therapy (TRT) for accessible tumors (uterus, oral cavity, skin, etc.)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call