Targeted anti-corruption in LMICs: developmental governance and health systems research

Abstract

Abstract Traditional approaches to anti-corruption have relied upon broad-based legal change and the introduction transparency and accountability measures. The evidence to date shows that these have been unsuccessful in reducing corruption in health and other sectors in low and middle income countries. Traditional approaches often assume that corruption is driven by individual greed, immorality or opportunism caused by a lack of accountability measures and that once corruption is rendered visible that there will be a channel through which it can be acted upon. In many LMICs, however, corruption and rule breaking is widespread and much better understood as a systemic problem. In these settings, health workers often break rules to solve the problems of working in overstretched, underfunded health systems. In these settings, policy often does not match the realities of an underfunded health system, and so sticking to the rules can have harm career progression or the ability to care for ones family. New approaches to anti-corruption based on Mushtaq Khan's idea of developmental governance take these context specific factors into account and look for targeted, feasible and high impact action that can create improvements of rule abiding behaviour that benefit the health system and the delivery of care. This presentation examines how it can be applied to the health system and the adaptations that it makes in the ways that we work on anti-corruption in health. It examines the ways in which policy can be changed so that groups of actors in the system are be incentivised to engage in abiding behaviour as they recognize that it is in their interests to do so.