Abstract

Simple SummaryIn the era of precision medicine, novel targets have emerged on the surface of cancer cells, which have been exploited for the purpose of radioligand therapy. However, there have been variations in the way these receptors are expressed, especially in prostate cancers and neuroendocrine tumors. This variable expression of receptors across the grades of cancers led to the concept of ‘target heterogeneity’, which has not just impacted therapeutic decisions but also their outcomes. Radiopharmaceuticals targeting receptors need to be used when there are specific indicators—either clinical, radiological, or at molecular level—warranting their use. In addition, response to these radioligands can be assessed using different techniques, whereby we can prognosticate further outcomes. We shall also discuss, in this review, the conventional as well as novel approaches of detecting heterogeneity in prostate cancers and neuroendocrine tumors.Tumor or target heterogeneity (TH) implies presence of variable cellular populations having different genomic characteristics within the same tumor, or in different tumor sites of the same patient. The challenge is to identify this heterogeneity, as it has emerged as the most common cause of ‘treatment resistance’, to current therapeutic agents. We have focused our discussion on ‘Prostate Cancer’ and ‘Neuroendocrine Tumors’, and looked at the established methods for demonstrating heterogeneity, each with its advantages and drawbacks. Also, the available theranostic radiotracers targeting PSMA and somatostatin receptors combined with targeted systemic agents, have been described. Lu-177 labeled PSMA and DOTATATE are the ‘standard of care’ radionuclide therapeutic tracers for management of progressive treatment-resistant prostate cancer and NET. These approved therapies have shown reasonable benefit in treatment outcome, with improvement in quality of life parameters. Various biomarkers and predictors of response to radionuclide therapies targeting TH which are currently available and those which can be explored have been elaborated in details. Imaging-based features using artificial intelligence (AI) need to be developed to further predict the presence of TH. Also, novel theranostic tools binding to newer targets on surface of cancer cell should be explored to overcome the treatment resistance to current treatment regimens.

Highlights

  • At last gleams of light have come, and I am almost convinced that species are not immutable, C

  • As the current ‘standard of care’ for radioligand therapy is well-established in NET and prostate cancer, this review shall focus on these tumor types

  • Liquid biopsy allows the tracking of the evolution of different cell subclones, and this was proven to be effective in the follow-up of patients with prostate cancer treated with targeted therapy in the metastatic setting [6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

At last gleams of light have come, and I am almost convinced that species are not immutable, C. The reasons for heterogeneity of tumor clones amongst patients and within metastases can be several, guided primarily through activated and deactivated genes and genomes, either due to intrinsic programming or through external therapeutic pressure This had led to a paradigm shift in the management of cancers i.e., from blanket treatment with ‘nonspecific’ chemotherapy to exploring treatment options for targeting cancer cells and tailored according to the need of a patient (personalized medicine). Liquid biopsy allows the tracking of the evolution of different cell subclones, and this was proven to be effective in the follow-up of patients with prostate cancer treated with targeted therapy in the metastatic setting [6]

Target Heterogeneity in Cancers
Heterogeneity and Grading of Cancers
Approaches to Assess Tumor Heterogeneity
In Vitro Molecular Pathology
Serum-Based Biomarkers
Molecular Imaging-Based Biomarkers
Liquid Biopsy
Pharmacogenomics-Based Markers
Predictors of Response to Radioligand Therapy
Imaging Features and Target Heterogeneity
Vascular Heterogeneity
Cellularity Heterogeneity
Intratumoral Heterogeneity
Tumor Proliferation Heterogeneity
Results
Findings
Future Directions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call