Abstract

The attentional blink (AB) describes a time-based deficit in processing the second of two masked targets. The AB is attenuated if successive targets appear between the first and final target, or if a cueing target is positioned before the final target. Using various speeds of stimulus presentation, the current study employed successive targets and cueing targets to confirm and extend an understanding of target-target cueing in the AB. In Experiment 1, three targets were presented sequentially at rates of 30 msec/item or 90 msec/item. Successive targets presented at 90 msec improved performance compared with non-successive targets. However, accuracy was equivalently high for successive and non-successive targets presented at 30 msec/item, suggesting that–regardless of whether they occurred consecutively–those items fell within the temporally defined attentional window initiated by the first target. Using four different presentation speeds, Experiment 2 confirmed the time-based definition of the AB and the success of target-cueing at 30 msec/item. This experiment additionally revealed that cueing was most effective when resources were not devoted to the cue, thereby implicating capacity limitations in the AB. Across both experiments, a novel order-error measure suggested that errors tend to decrease with an increasing duration between the targets, but also revealed that certain stimulus conditions result in stable order accuracy. Overall, the results are best encapsulated by target-based and resource-sharing theories of the AB, which collectively value the contributions of capacity limitations and optimizing transient attention in time.

Highlights

  • The attentional blink (AB) describes a deficit in processing the second of two masked targets (T1 and T2) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream [1,2]

  • T2 accuracy is reduced if T2 appears within the blink period, the AB is not an exhaustive deficit because T2 remains accurately detected on some trials

  • There was no evidence of a successive target advantage when items were presented at 30 msec/item

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The attentional blink (AB) describes a deficit in processing the second of two masked targets (T1 and T2) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream [1,2]. T2 detection is impaired if T2 appears 200–600 msec after T1 but T2 is spared from the deficit if it is presented immediately after T1 at lag 1, a phenomenon termed ‘lag sparing’ [3,4]. This study aimed to confirm established effects regarding the temporal definition of the AB, and to validate existing cueing phenomena using more rapid stimulus presentation streams than have been previously reported. We examined the successive target advantage phenomenon using 30 msec and 90 msec presentation speeds in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, we examined target-target cueing across four different presentation speeds

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call