Abstract

DNA transposition contributes to genomic plasticity. Target capture is a key step in the transposition process, because it contributes to the selection of new insertion sites. Nothing or little is known about how eukaryotic mariner DNA transposons trigger this step. In the case of Mos1, biochemistry and crystallography have deciphered several inverted terminal repeat-transposase complexes that are intermediates during transposition. However, the target capture complex is still unknown. Here, we show that the preintegration complex (i.e., the excised transposon) is the only complex able to capture a target DNA. Mos1 transposase does not support target commitment, which has been proposed to explain Mos1 random genomic integrations within host genomes. We demonstrate that the TA dinucleotide used as the target is crucial both to target recognition and in the chemistry of the strand transfer reaction. Bent DNA molecules are better targets for the capture when the target DNA is nicked two nucleotides apart from the TA. They improve strand transfer when the target DNA contains a mismatch near the TA dinucleotide.

Highlights

  • The target capture is a critical step for the selection of integration site

  • To set up a target capture assay, preintegration complex (PIC) were first formed using cold precleaved inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) (PC-ITR, mimicking the ITR extremities cleaved by transposase on the two strands) and the purified transposase MOS1 under catalytic conditions (Mg2ϩ, 30 °C)

  • Revealed that the three nicked targets all behaved in the same way as the wild type target toward strand transfer, i.e., the percentage of integration depends of the percentage of target capture (Fig. 7F), and sequencing the integration products showed that the ITR was integrated at the TA dinucleotide

Read more

Summary

Background

The target capture is a critical step for the selection of integration site. Results: Mos transposon excision occurred before target capture. Contrarily to RAG1/2 that creates a 5-bp duplication upon insertion [24], mariner elements generate a 2-bp duplication All these remarks suggest that target capture complexes are organized differently depending on the transposase involved and result in different integration pathways. Within the mariner family, the fact that the first model to be studied, namely Himar1 [29], displayed a target capture contrasting with other transposases (Tn5, Tn10, and RAG1/2), leaves open the question of the chronology of events (excision/ target capture/integration or target capture/excision/integration) for the other mariner elements In this perspective, the Mos element is of particular interest, because it is the only eukaryotic transposon for which the complete transposition cycle can be reconstituted step by step in vitro and for which crystallographic data of the excised element (precleaved ITRs with two transposases) are available [9]. The various models previously published for Mos are discussed in the light of our findings

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
C Integration product sequence
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call