Taphonomic Inferences on Boring Habit in the Richmondian Onniella meeki Epibole

Abstract

Other| December 01, 2000 Taphonomic Inferences on Boring Habit in the Richmondian Onniella meeki Epibole PETER KAPLAN; PETER KAPLAN 1University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar TOMASZ K. BAUMILLER TOMASZ K. BAUMILLER 1University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information PETER KAPLAN 1University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 TOMASZ K. BAUMILLER 1University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Publisher: SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology Accepted: 08 Aug 2000 First Online: 03 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1938-5323 Print ISSN: 0883-1351 Society for Sedimentary Geology PALAIOS (2000) 15 (6): 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1669/0883-1351(2000)015<0499:TIOBHI>2.0.CO;2 Article history Accepted: 08 Aug 2000 First Online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation PETER KAPLAN, TOMASZ K. BAUMILLER; Taphonomic Inferences on Boring Habit in the Richmondian Onniella meeki Epibole. PALAIOS 2000;; 15 (6): 499–510. doi: https://doi.org/10.1669/0883-1351(2000)015<0499:TIOBHI>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyPALAIOS Search Advanced Search Abstract Shell boring is one of the few quantifiable, well-preserved biotic interactions in the fossil record. While some workers have used boring intensity as a proxy for predation pressure in both Recent and fossil assemblages, others have warned that taphonomic and other effects can alter the boring intensity and lead to paleoecological misinterpretation. When the biocoenosis is known, however, taphonomic effects can be “undone” a posteriori. Because the valve ratio of any bivalved organism must be 1:1 in the biocoenosis, strengths of between-valve taphonomic biases can be calculated directly for any disarticulated assemblage of bivalved fossils. By back-calculating the biocoenotic boring intensities, improved estimates of boring stereotypy may be obtained. These “restored” boring intensities can provide more accurate paleoecological interpretations of boring habit while remaining numerically conservative.Taphonomic analysis of a bored Ordovician brachiopod assemblage shows that (1) the assemblage had experienced negligible differential transport; and (2) convex (pedicle) valves have been preferentially crushed in place. Comparing the taphonomy of the assemblage to a set of laboratory taphonomic regimes reveals that valve-valve contact may be of great consequence in skeletal taphonomy. In particular, valve-valve contacts appear to promote (1) preferential destruction of convex valves; and (2) subequal destruction of bored vs. unbored valves. Taking into account these taphonomic effects, numerous hypotheses of boring habit—including mixed-motive boring—have been tested using a probabilistic model. The model herein presented indicates a likely contribution of 10–15% predatory boring in the assemblage. The usefulness of probabilistic models for providing simultaneous, realistic tests of multiple hypotheses is emphasized. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.