Tanggung Jawab PPAT Atas Pembatalan Akta Yang Dibuat Dihadapannya

Abstract

This study proposes two formulations of the problem, namely, first, how to apply the precautionary principle of the Land Titles Registrar (PPAT) in formulating the deed so that it will not be cancelled, and secondly, what is the responsibility of the PPAT for canceling the deed made before them. This type of research is normative legal research supported by information from various sources. The approach used in this study is a conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach), statutory approach (Statute Approach) and case approach (Case Approach), then analyzed in a descriptive qualitative manner. The results of this study conclude that, first, one of the application of the precautionary principle that must be carried out by PPAT is by issuing a Statement of Authenticity which is approved and signed by the parties concerned. The purpose of this Statement of Authenticity is to minimize and prevent bad faith from the parties applying before the PPAT. In addition to minimizing and preventing bad faith from the parties in the form of providing false statements or fake documents, the Statement of Authenticity is also useful for providing protection for PPAT to not get involved in legal problems. Second, the responsibility of the PPAT for canceling the deed made before them is a form of consequence that must be accepted by the PPAT who is proven to have committed a violation. As a form of accountability for violations committed, the PPAT receives sanctions in accordance with the form of the violation, namely in the form of civil, criminal and administrative sanctions. Meanwhile, products made by PPAT are authentic deeds, so their status will be null and void.