Tamsulosin, versus Tamsulosin in combination with Solifenacin versus Tamsulosin in combination with Trospium chloride for treatment of Double-J stent-related symptoms

Abstract

Abstract Background Stenting has been primarily used to treat urinary obstruction and the frequency of this use is increasing with the increase in ureteroscopic management. In cases of acute obstruction, a stent is used temporarily to stabilize the patient until definitive therapy. The stent is generally placed if there is accompanying ureteric injury or in those with a residual stone after ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Placing a ureteric stent after ureteroscopy with stone extraction is done by some urologists routinely to prevent possible stenosis or to decrease secondary pain caused by mucosal oedema. However, routinely placing a stent to prevent late complications or to relieve flank pain from a ureteric stricture or mucosal oedema after surgery is questionable. Stent-related symptoms are quite problem in nearly 80% of patients that has been implicated in short-term morbidities in terms of negative impact on the patients’ quality of life, body pains and hematuria. Various attempts had been made to minimize these symptoms but pharmacological treatment is the simplest and a noninvasive option. Numerous drugs had been tried to relieve these symptoms like alpha blockers, anticholinergics and analgesics. Objective To compare the efficacy of tamsulosin alone, tamsulosin in combination with solifenacin and tamsulosin in combination with trospium chloride in in the relief of Double-J stentrelated symptoms following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL). Patients and Methods The present study was a prospective randomized comparative study conducted on 60 patients whith double-J stent inserted following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) in Ain Shams University Hospital and Karmouz Hospital over a period of 1 year. The patient were randomized into 3 equal groups (1:1:1 randomization): Group A:20 patients were treated by Tamsulosin (0.4 mg) alone once daily. Group B:20 patients were treated by Tamsulosin (0.4 mg) once daily in combination with Solifenacin (5 mg) once daily. Group C: 20 patients were treated by Tamsulosin (0.4 mg) once daily in combination with Trospium chloride (20 mg) twice daily. All patients were assessed 1 week postoperatively after Double-J stent insertion. Then, the patients were start the medical treatment and were assessed 3 weeks after starting the medical treatment. Results The study shows that the combination of the tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day and trospium chloride 20 mg twice/day are significantly superior to the tamsulosin 0.4 mg once alone / day and the combination of the tamsulosin 0.4 mg /day and the solifenacine 5 mg /day for the treatment of the LUTS in d.j stent cases except in the frecuncy the combination of tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day and the solifenacine 5 mg/day are signicantly superior. Also, the drugs are safe with mild few side effects. There were no significant differences regarding headache, dizziness, backache, myalgia and orthostatic hypotension. Conclusion The study show that the combination of the tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day and the trospium chloride 20 mg twice /day are significantly superior to the tamsulosin 0.4 mg once alone / day and the combination of the tamsulosin 0.4 mg /day and the solifenacine 5 mg /day for the treatment of the LUTS in d.j stent cases except in the frecuncy the combination of tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day and the solifenacine 5 mg/day are signicantly superior.