Abstract

It is nowadays widely agreed that gender identity is socially and culturally constructed. This construction is enabled by parental and other adult models, parental treatment, peer pressure and the media. Today television has a powerful impact, but in the mid-twentieth century books were more influential for many children. Did popular children’s fiction of this period merely reflect society’s bipolar gender constructs, or did it in any way challenge these? Whereas folklinguistics would suggest that females are more verbose than males, sociolinguists have found the opposite to be true in many contexts; public discourse such as meetings and the classroom tends to be dominated by males. There have been a number of studies of verbosity in real-life contexts; this cross-disciplinary study of four children’s adventure books examines the discourse to see who is given the most ‘talking time’. It was hypothesised that the authors would be influenced either by the folklinguistic view and give their girls long speech turns, or by the actual discourse they themselves experienced and give the boys the lion’s share. The actual picture that emerges is far more complex, suggesting that while some writers did indeed reflect and support the accepted gender roles of the society in which they wrote, others created discourse which interwove gender, age and personality, with personality the most powerful factor in determining dominance.

Highlights

  • This study crosses the boundaries between linguistics and literature

  • Did popular children’s fiction of this period merely reflect society’s bipolar gender constructs, or did it in any way challenge these? Whereas folklinguistics would suggest that females are more verbose than males, sociolinguists have found the opposite to be true in many contexts; public discourse such as meetings and the classroom tends to be dominated by males

  • There have been a number of studies of verbosity in real-life contexts; this cross-disciplinary study of four children’s adventure books examines the discourse to see who is given the most ‘talking time’

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study crosses the boundaries between linguistics and literature. It uses the sociolinguistic concept of verbosity or ‘talking time’ to analyse selected texts of children’s adventure fiction, with the aim of determining whether dialogue in such texts reflects the gender norms of real-life discourse, those of popular mythology, or neither of these.Language and GenderIn 1997 Schlegoff suggested that gender should only be the focus of discourse analysis in cases where it is made salient by the participants. This study crosses the boundaries between linguistics and literature It uses the sociolinguistic concept of verbosity or ‘talking time’ to analyse selected texts of children’s adventure fiction, with the aim of determining whether dialogue in such texts reflects the gender norms of real-life discourse, those of popular mythology, or neither of these. Otto Jespersen in 1922 only dedicated a single chapter of his book Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin to ‘The woman’, and he claimed women had a smaller vocabulary than men (possibly true in view of the inequalities in education) and were more verbose. This last claim is pure folklinguistics, but is still widely believed by the general public (Coates, 2004)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call