Abstract
By reframing talent identification as a status-organizing process, the current study draws on status characteristics theory to examine how peers form spontaneous talent appraisals of their team members. Tree-based data mining techniques were used to model how different status characteristics and behaviors interact in predicting different, equifinal routes to achieving the status of most talented team member. Although multiple types of talent were valued by peers in our sample of 44 multidisciplinary teams (N=238), the status of most talented team member was most often granted to peers perceived as having both leadership and analytic talent, with a degree in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) serving a dominant signaling function. Talent management practitioners could capitalize on knowledge of informal peer hierarchies to increase the legitimacy, transparency, and acceptance of the sensitive practice of formally singling out a small number of employees as ‘talents’ and awarding them additional resources.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.