Abstract
AbstractTransfrontier wildlife corridors can be successful conservation tools, connecting protected areas and reducing the impact of habitat fragmentation on mobile species. Urban wildlife corridors have been proposed as a potential mitigation tool to facilitate the passage of elephants through towns without causing conflict with urban communities. However, because such corridors are typically narrow and close to human development, wildlife (particularly large mammals) may be less likely to use them. We used remote-sensor camera traps and global positioning system collars to identify the movement patterns of African elephants Loxondonta africana through narrow, urban corridors in Botswana. The corridors were in three types of human-dominated land-use designations with varying levels of human activity: agricultural, industrial and open-space recreational land. We found that elephants used the corridors within all three land-use designations and we identified, using a model selection approach, that season, time of day and rainfall were important factors in determining the presence of elephants in the corridors. Elephants moved more slowly through the narrow corridors compared with their movement patterns through broader, wide-ranging corridors. Our results indicate that urban wildlife corridors are useful for facilitating elephants to pass through urban areas.
Highlights
Human population increase has resulted in increased fragmentation of wildlife habitat (Johnsingh & Williams, ; Osborn & Parker, ) and the formation of isolated protected areas
The small-scale movement of wildlife through human settlements is relatively unexplored (Carter et al, ) but is increasingly important as human populations increase and people come into closer contact with wildlife
Our objective was to assess whether the African elephant would use narrow urban wildlife corridors
Summary
Human population increase has resulted in increased fragmentation of wildlife habitat (Johnsingh & Williams, ; Osborn & Parker, ) and the formation of isolated protected areas (the so-called island effect). Wildlife corridors that connect favoured habitats (Caro et al, ; Mangewa et al, ) are potentially a solution to the problem, their value has been debated (Hilty & Merenlender, ). Research has concentrated on the value of transfrontier connections through humanmodified landscapes, linking protected wildlife areas (Osborn & Parker, ; Douglas-Hamilton et al, ; Mangewa et al, ), and creating vital links between protected areas and resources (Gilbert et al, ; Hilty & Merenlender, ; Caro et al, ; Mangewa et al, ). The small-scale movement of wildlife through human settlements is relatively unexplored (Carter et al, ) but is increasingly important as human populations increase and people come into closer contact with wildlife
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
