Abstract

Recent evidence from visual word recognition points to the important role of embedded words, suggesting that embedded words are activated independently of whether they are accompanied by an affix or a non-affix. The goal of the present research was to more closely examine the mechanisms involved in embedded word activation, particularly with respect to the “edge-alignedness” of the embedded word. We conducted two experiments that used masked priming in combination with lexical decision. In Experiment 1, monomorphemic target words were either preceded by a compound word prime (e.g., textbook-BOOK/textbook-TEXT), a compound-nonword prime (e.g., pilebook-BOOK/textpile-TEXT), a non-compound nonword prime (e.g., pimebook-BOOK/textpime-TEXT) or an unrelated prime (e.g., textjail-BOOK/jailbook-TEXT). The results revealed significant priming effects, not only in the compound word and compound-nonword conditions, but also in the non-compound nonword condition, suggesting that embedded words (e.g., book) were activated independently of whether they occurred in combination with a real morpheme (e.g., pilebook) or a non-morphemic constituent (e.g., pimebook). Priming in the compound word condition was greater than in the two nonword conditions, indicating that participants benefited from the whole-word representation of real compound words. Constituent priming occurred independently of whether the target word was the first or the second embedded constituent of the prime (e.g., textbook-BOOK vs. textbook-TEXT). In Experiment 2, significant priming effects were found for edge-aligned embedded constituents (e.g., pimebook-BOOK), but not for mid-embedded (e.g., pibookme-BOOK) or the outer-embedded constituents (e.g., bopimeok-BOOK), suggesting that edge-alignedness is a key factor determining the activation of embedded words.

Highlights

  • For many years, researchers have examined the mechanisms involved in reading morphologically complex words

  • No priming was found in the non-compound control condition. These results suggest that compound words are automatically segmented into their morphemic constituents without any influence from semantics, and are consistent with much prior masked priming research on affixed words

  • The primary goal of our study was to investigate embedded word activation processes operating during the processing of compound words and compound nonwords by using masked priming combined with the lexical decision task

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Researchers have examined the mechanisms involved in reading morphologically complex words. No priming was found in the non-compound control condition (window-WIN) These results suggest that compound words are automatically segmented into their morphemic constituents without any influence from semantics, and are consistent with much prior masked priming research on affixed words. The mechanism that has been described to account for pseudo-affixed word priming effects (e.g., corner-corn; Rastle et al, 2004), suggesting that affixes are rapidly chunked/strippedoff, can obviously not account for the type of structural compound priming effects observed by Fiorentino and Fund-Reznicek (2009) Instead, these findings indicate that the activation of embedded stems is only successful if the written word can be exhaustively decomposed into its morphemic consituents (as is the case tea-cup and honey-moon) and so such activation would not occur with non-compound words such as window. Teacup can be divided into tea and cup, honeymoon can be divided into honey and moon, whereas for window the principle of full decomposition fails. Grainger and Beyersmann (2017) propose that the principle of full decomposition provides a boost in activation to the embedded word that helps overcome the lateral inhibition between the embedded word and the whole letter string, which explains why significant priming is observed in the teacup and honeymoon conditions, but not in the window condition

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call