Abstract

In response to the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic, virtual Court hearings in Malaysia are now conducted in a way that enables proceedings to continue, ensuring its accessibility to the public. However, the attendees of virtual Court hearings remain bound to the same prohibitions as those enforced in conventional hearings. In Malaysia, the Court bans photography of any proceedings in the Courtroom, in which, disregarding the prohibition, can cite one for contempt of Court. The excessive use of digital photography may trigger photo manipulation by creating unrealistic images, which causes a public misconception. However, Zoom Court hearings have remained a permanent feature of the Malaysian justice system post-Covid-19. This research aims to examine whether photography in Court proceedings amounts to contempt by disrupting the ongoing process. The methodology used is qualitative approach based on library and internet research. This research found that photography of Court proceedings and sharing the photographs on social media platforms give rise to the dangers of witness intimidation and prejudice to the accused person’s right to a fair hearing. It suggests a need to envision a detailed guideline, clearer signage, and develop special measures for the stakeholders to use mobile phones with cameras in Court proceedings.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.