Abstract
Legal reasoning is often couched in terms of legal classification. We examine how three models of classification — Classical, Probabilistic and Exemplar — are used to perform legal classification. We argue that all three models of classification are implicitly applied by existing AI methods. The CABARET (“CAse-BAsed REasoning Tool”) system is suggested as an architecture that applies all three models. The relative difficulty of revising knowledge in rule form, in HYPO-style dimension form, and exemplar form is considered.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
