Abstract
Human societies face various unsustainability problems, often characterized as “wicked” in the sense that they have no single definitive formulation. Thus, the role of creativity or insight in solving such problems has attracted a lot of attention from scholars. Therefore, this study investigated how an emerging methodology, Future Design (and its unique intervention of asking problem solvers to take a future generation’s perspective), can facilitate insight problem solving (IPS) and the generation of sustainable solutions. In a municipality in Japan, nine officers from a bureau responsible for water supply management participated in a series of seven Future Design workshops. In two groups, these officers created visions of water supply management 30 years into the future, taking the perspective of a future generation working in the same municipality. On the basis of in-depth transcription analyses of these workshops, we obtained a hypothetical framework demonstrating that four factors mediate the influence of perspective taking on IPS: (a) Discounting the present generation’s cost, (b) contrasting the future with the present, (c) deconstructing hierarchy, and (d) intellectual joy. While the first three mediators (a, b, and c) were considered to be contributors to the problem reframing and IPS via constraint relaxation, the fourth (d) was considered to do so via positive interpretation. Further, the reason why taking a future generation’s perspective is likely to lead to sustainable solutions, useful for the future—rather than the present—generation, is also discussed.
Highlights
Human societies face various issues threatening their sustainability, which is ascribed to intergenerational nature of these issues
Sustainability is widely understood to embody “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” [1] (p. 43)
Problems of unsustainability are wicked partly because no human can live “sustainably” in its exact sense, and “there is no definitive formulation of what sustainability means and how it is achieved” [3] (p. 79)
Summary
Human societies face various issues threatening their sustainability, which is ascribed to intergenerational nature of these issues. Such a study’s hypothesis-generation roles are widely recognized [20,21,22,23]; this study provides a hypothetical conceptual framework that explains how taking a future generation’s perspective can contribute to IPS. Cognitive readiness may be interpreted as the problem solvers’ awareness that they are attempting to overcome an impasse and obtain an insight on a meaningful frame for a problem With these four pathways to overcome obstacles in obtaining insight for problem (re)framing and solutions, the research question posed in the Introduction can be rewritten as follows: Research Question 1: Which pathways (i.e., (1) positive interpretation, (2) divergence training, (3) constraint relaxation, and (4) cognitive readiness) are mediated by the intervention requesting that unsustainability problem solvers take a future generation’s perspective? With these four pathways to overcome obstacles in obtaining insight for problem (re)framing and solutions, the research question posed in the Introduction can be rewritten as follows: Research Question 1: Which pathways (i.e., (1) positive interpretation, (2) divergence training, (3) constraint relaxation, and (4) cognitive readiness) are mediated by the intervention requesting that unsustainability problem solvers take a future generation’s perspective? Research Question 2: What factors serve as mediators of this intervention’s effect on these pathways?
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
