Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) enable drivers to devote their primary attention to non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs). Consequently, AVs must provide intelligibility services appropriate to drivers’ in-situ states and in-car activities to ensure driver safety, and accounting for the type of NDRT being performed can result in higher intelligibility. We discovered that sleeping is drivers’ most preferred NDRT, and this could also result in a critical scenario when a take-over request (TOR) occurs. In this study, we designed TOR situations where drivers are woken from sleep in a high-fidelity AV simulator with motion systems, aiming to examine how drivers react to a TOR provided with our experimental conditions. We investigated how driving performance, perceived task workload, AV acceptance, and physiological responses in a TOR vary according to two factors: (1) feedforward timings and (2) presentation modalities. The results showed that when awakened by a TOR alert delivered >10 s prior to an event, drivers were more focused on the driving context and were unlikely to be influenced by TOR modality, whereas TOR alerts delivered <5 s prior needed a visual accompaniment to quickly inform drivers of on-road situations. This study furthers understanding of how a driver’s cognitive and physical demands interact with TOR situations at the moment of waking from sleep and designs effective interventions for intelligibility services to best comply with safety and driver experience in AVs.

Highlights

  • Autonomous vehicle (AV) technologies, such as Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) that correspond to Society of Automotive Engineering (SAE) Level 1 or 2, have become common, if minor, components of vehicles available today [1]

  • We investigated how driving performance, perceived task workload, AV acceptance, and physiological responses vary so as to present a guide and manner in which to align intelligibility services for take-over request alerts that are appropriate to wake a driver from sleep and the take-over scenario with the greatest needs

  • Drivers awakened by a take-over request alert delivered >10 s prior to an event were more focused on the driving context regardless of the presentation manner

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Autonomous vehicle (AV) technologies, such as Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) that correspond to Society of Automotive Engineering (SAE) Level 1 or 2, have become common, if minor, components of vehicles available today [1]. These partial vehicle automations have spurred the development of more advanced AV technologies. If a driver does not recognize the route the AV is following or is unsatisfied with automated driving, for instance, they might take over vehicle operation, and because today’s vehicle systems can switch between automatic and manual modes [5,6,7], often with a slight (perhaps mistaken) tap of the brake pedal or steering wheel, driver acceptance of AV technology can be lost

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call