Abstract
Globalization has done little to fight global poverty and inequality. That can change if those in favor of a freer and fairer global trade and finance system link that regime with core worker rights. This connection will result in a reduction of global poverty and a more equitable distribution of trade gains. Prior to the U.S.-Cambodian Bilateral Textile Agreement (USCBTA), legal architectures linking free trade and global finance with core worker rights have adopted adjudicative or quasi-adjudicative models. By contrast, the USCBTA adopted a regulatory approach. This article analyzes the relative strengths and weaknesses of a regulatory model for international labor law enforcement and offers key recommendations for the future.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
