Abstract

Current jury instruction practice provides juries with one-size-fits-all instructions. These instructions consistently exceed juries’ reading levels and result in disparity in juror participation and capital sentencing. This Article is the first to propose measuring a specific jury’s reading level and allowing attorneys to craft instructions that match that jury’s reading level. There are tools available to attorneys that will allow them to measure a jury’s reading level and tools that will allow them to evaluate the comprehensibility of instructions. Courts have previously solidified these linguistic-measuring tools’ legal validity, opening the door for trial judges to implement tailored instructions without fear of appellate reversal. Thus, Instead of using one-size-fits-all instructions, attorneys should be tailoring instructions to ensure proper jury application of the law.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call