Tail‐Beat Patterns in Dual‐Frequency Identification Sonar Echograms and their Potential Use for Species Identification and Bioenergetics Studies

Abstract

AbstractWe observed patterns in echograms of data collected with a dual‐frequency identification sonar (DIDSON) that were related to the tail beats of fish. These patterns reflect the size, shape, and swimming motion of the fish and also depend on the fish's angle relative to the axis of the beam. When the tail is large enough to reflect sound of sufficient intensity and the body is angled such that the tail beat produces periodic changes in the range extent covered by the fish image, then the tail beat becomes clearly visible on echograms that plot the intensity maximum of all beams. The analysis of DIDSON echograms of a mix of upstream‐migrating Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and sockeye salmon O. nerka resulted in the separation of two groups: (1) fish of sockeye salmon size that swam with a tail‐beat frequency (TBF) between 2.0 and 3.5 beats/s and (2) fish of Chinook salmon size with a TBF between 1.0 and 2.0 beats/s. There was no correlation between TBF and fish size within each group, which suggests that the observed difference in TBF between the two groups was species‐specific rather than an indirect effect of the groups' difference in size. The technique of extracting TBF from DIDSON echograms may also be useful for bioenergetics studies. Compared with electromyogram telemetry, it offers the advantages of being nonintrusive and faster to set up and analyze and therefore is suitable for analyzing larger sample sizes. The disadvantages are that the technique's potential is limited to relatively large fish, it can cover only relatively small areas, it cannot be used to follow individual fish over long distances, and some environments are too noisy to produce DIDSON images of sufficient quality.