Tafamidis delays neurological progression comparably across Val30Met and non-Val30Met genotypes in transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy.

Abstract

Background and purposeTo better characterize the effects of tafamidis in non‐Val30Met patients with transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy, this post hoc analysis compared the neurological results from a 12‐month, open‐label study of non‐Val30Met versus Val30Met patients at month 12 from the 18‐month, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled registration study. A baseline covariate adjusted analysis was used to control for differences in baseline neurological severity.MethodsNeurological function was assessed using the Neuropathy Impairment Score – Lower Limbs (NIS‐LL) in three cohorts: Val30Met tafamidis (n = 64), Val30Met placebo (n = 61) and non‐Val30Met tafamidis (n = 21). The change in NIS‐LL from baseline to month 12 for Val30Met and non‐Val30Met tafamidis‐treated patients was compared with the change from baseline at month 12 for Val30Met placebo‐treated patients using a mixed‐effects model for repeated measures (MMRM).ResultsThe baseline adjusted mean (standard error) change in NIS‐LL values at month 12 was similar for Val30Met [1.60 (0.78)] and non‐Val30Met [1.62 (1.43)] tafamidis‐treated patients and less than that observed in the Val30Met placebo‐treated group [4.72 (0.77); P = 0.0055 for Val30Met and P = 0.0592 for non‐Val30Met]. Based on the MMRM, the magnitude of change in both tafamidis‐treated cohorts was similar across the range of observed baseline NIS‐LL values, and was consistently less than that observed in the Val30Met placebo‐treated group at month 12.ConclusionsThis baseline‐adjusted analysis demonstrated that tafamidis treatment delayed neurological progression comparably in Val30Met and non‐Val30Met patients across a range of baseline NIS‐LL values. Neurological progression in these two genotype groups may be more similar than previously considered.