Abstract

Engagement-level simulation is a quantitative way to evaluate the effectiveness of weapon systems before construction and acquisition, minimizing the risk of investment. Though contractors have built simulation systems with high fidelity models of weapon systems and battlefields, developing competent tactics to give full play to new weapon systems in simulation experiments is labor intensive, as most classical tactics tend to be out of date. In this work, we proposed a tactics exploration framework (TEF) that applied grammar-based genetic programming (GP) to generating and evolving tactics in the engagement-level simulation. Tactics are represented with modular behavior trees (BTs) for compatibility with the genetic operators. Experiments to explore submarine tactics have been conducted to observe and study the exploration process. The experimental results show that the TEF based on GP is efficient to explore tactics in the formalism of BTs.

Highlights

  • The construction of a new conceptual weapon system requires a large budget and an extended period

  • We proposed our tactics exploration framework (TEF) based on grammar-based genetic programming (GP) to evolve tactics in simulation, in which a grammar of behavior tree (BT)[9] formalism is used for tactic representation

  • Based on BT formalism, we developed a domain specific language (DSL) for tactic representation with Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF)[29]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The construction of a new conceptual weapon system requires a large budget and an extended period. Engagement-level simulation is a quantitative method to evaluate the effectiveness of a weapon system before its construction and acquisition, minimizing the investment risk and providing feedback to optimize the technology solutions[1]. Various technology solutions for new weapon systems need to be evaluated in multiple engagement scenarios. Classical tactics are no longer applicable to operate weapon systems utilizing advanced technologies, and test scenarios show that no universal tactic performs well under these conditions; a lot of competent tactics are required to conduct a comprehensive evaluation. Developing tactics requires significant domain expertise, and scripting tactics is time-consuming and labor-intensive in practice[2]. Subject matter experts (SMEs) need a more efficient method to develop competent tactics

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call