Abstract

The water sector is, currently and for the foreseeable future, challenged by rising levels of uncertainty in demand and availability of water, in a context of aging infrastructure and limited investment. In order to support strategic planning, water companies need a way to assess how their system behaves when faced with a range of changing conditions (climatic trends, asset deterioration, behavioral patterns, etc.) as well as accidents/incidents and/or extreme events (wildcards). In this study, a resilience assessment methodology was demonstrated, with ‘stress tests’ alternative water system configurations (including systems designed with decentralized or distributed philosophies) under a range of scenarios and extreme events. A ‘resilience profile graph’ was developed to quantify the performance of each configuration. The methodology was applied to the real-world urban water system of Oasen, which supplies the eastern part of the Province of South Holland, where the current system configuration and two potential future configurations were tested (one decentralized and one distributed). We show how the concept of resilience, operationalized through this methodology, can assist long term decision making and support strategic infrastructure planning.

Highlights

  • IntroductionInfrastructure planning and management (operational, tactical and strategic) relates to being concerned with the longer term: infrastructures we build today need to provide the service they were designed to deliver for several decades into the future (e.g., for a horizon of 25–50 years)

  • We argue that what is required for designing real world resilient systems is a consistent methodology, based on a formal operational definition of resilience, capable to assess the overall performance of an urban water system, without being proprietary or tied to a specific topological or technological scheme

  • We conclude that the resilience assessment methodology is easy to implement on practically any water system, after suitable customization like case-specific model inputs and urban water systems (UWS) configurations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Infrastructure planning and management (operational, tactical and strategic) relates to being concerned with the longer term: infrastructures we build today need to provide the service they were designed to deliver for several decades into the future (e.g., for a horizon of 25–50 years). The actual ongoing renewal rates are lagging behind what should be ideal for ensuring future uncomplicated operation [3]. For example, with the current rate of infrastructure renewal, the average sewer has to last about 700 years [4] To reduce this unrealistic expectation, levels of investment required by the water sector are very high [5,6].

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call